Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport's Guess: Panthers will look to trade Cam once healthy


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, ickmule said:

Not surprised if it does happen , this team is in blow it up mode.  They are going to start over fresh.  I’m also sure Cam doesn’t want to be part of a complete overhaul. Would you ? 

I've been preparing myself because of what Jeremy and Zack have said here, but it just doesnt sit well with me.  I understanding rebooting, but Cam has never been part of the problem here.  He's a former league MVP, and beat himself to a pulp carrying the team...  if he's truly 100% healthy, then imo, you give him every opportunity to remain a Panther.  We won't even get good value for him at this point bc of the injuries he's had over the last two years...  to me it's just disloyal and bad business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Said his "guess, understanding" is, the FO will look to trade Cam once he's healthy.  If this is true, F this front office.

 

Once healthy?  That can't be determined until OTA's at the earliest, right?  So that would mean his contract would be fully guaranteed at that time.   So you yes that would be the only way you would part with him before his contract ran out.  That would be the teams position.  What's is Cams position?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I've been preparing myself because of what Jeremy and Zack have said here, but it just doesnt sit well with me.  I understanding rebooting, but Cam has never been part of the problem here.  He's a former league MVP, and beat himself to a pulp carrying the team...  if he's truly 100% healthy, then imo, you give him every opportunity to remain a Panther.  We won't even get good value for him at this point bc of the injuries he's had over the last two years...  to me it's just disloyal and bad business.

I agree with you, but I have a feeling they aren’t going to keep him around.  I also don’t think he really wants to be part of this tear down that is going on.  It’s highly likely this team will win 5 games or less next season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if that's the direction we're going in then realistically he shouldn't be the only one on the trade block.

Our primary focus will shift to acquiring a worthy franchise quarterback to lead this team, and as we have seen Kyle Allen/Will Grier are simply not up to the task. The potential moves required to make this happen could upset some. But remember, "it's a business".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

that deleted thread that leaked the news before he announced sure seemed to suggest that rhule’s old college buddies knew

That was posted about 2 or 3 hours before Luke officially announced it.  It wasn't posted 2 months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...