Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dear Mr. Scott... : )


chknwing

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

He's a free agent too, and probably cheaper than Bridgewater.

I can just imagine how well that idea would go over here, though :)

It's just crazy enough to happen.  Brady has been credited for the development of Taysom so there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ugh. Moving on from a former NFL MVP QB with injury concerns to acquire a far lesser QB with significant injury history.

Hell no to all that, please.

One of those QBs played winning football this season and another didn’t play football this season 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It's just crazy enough to happen.  Brady has been credited for the development of Taysom so there's that.

As a QB? The man has thrown 13 total NFL passes (6/13 for 119 yards, 0 TD, and an INT)? He's a jack of all trades player and versatile roster piece, but he's not a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

One of those QBs played winning football this season and another didn’t play football this season 

True, they went 5-1 with Bridgewater but they were 1-1 against playoff teams. Let's be honest, he was a lesser version of Kyle Allen before the wheels fell off the Allen train. He threw 9 TDs in 6 games and 4 of them came in one game against the Bucs. This is one of the highest octane offenses in the NFL. He had a very good D to lean on in New Orleans, it's highly doubtful he'll have that here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

As a QB? The man has thrown 13 total NFL passes (6/13 for 119 yards, 0 TD, and an INT)? He's a jack of all trades player and versatile roster piece, but he's not a QB.

Brady might think he's ready. Hard to say.

But even if he's not, you could give him a try for a year while you use your resources to build up the tranches and other spots that need attention.

I've heard worse ideas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...