Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina sticking with Cam


WoahW

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, ncfan said:

This is just them trying to drum up trade interest

WFNZ talking about it now.  Said their sources down the street have told them the Panthers have recieved 0 phone calls and 0 teams have shown any interest despite what some other rumors that have been circulating 

Officially, you can't really talk about trades yet so I'd question that. Unofficially of course, everybody knows tampering happens so yeah, it's possible.

It's also valid that you can look back at multiple player trades and find team statements prior to the transaction that said things like "we're not even thinking about trading Player X" and/or "we hope Player X stays here for their whole career" and such, so practically speaking again, nothing is guaranteed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Actually, our own inside source had already said this several days ago in All Pro, but also added "for now" and that the situation is still fluid.

The usual standard employed here is the sources are trustworthy as long as they are saying what you want to hear.

It's not uncommon to see the same people call a source reliable or lousy depending on what they're saying. It's dumb, but it happens a lot.

Hey chief some of us has been saying this is what would be done from the beginning stop acting like you actually have a guy who knows what’s happening. 
 

Oh and then the discredit right away ignore my second post about insiders from you I’m not shocked at all. Beyond sad that a very vocal group with you leading the charge act the way you do towards a QB who brought the city and team to relevancy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The usual standard employed here is the sources are trustworthy as long as they are saying what you want to hear.

It's not uncommon to see the same people call a source reliable or lousy depending on what they're saying. It's dumb, but it happens a lot.

Yea I’m not one to play the convenience game. I won’t trust it unless I hear it from Tepper or Rhule. It was encouraging when Cam said it but like many have mentioned he doesn’t have final say. This is a good step forward but not the end all he all for the situation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2020 at 9:24 AM, WoahW said:

Hey chief some of us has been saying this is what would be done from the beginning stop acting like you actually have a guy who knows what’s happening. 

Oh and then the discredit right away ignore my second post about insiders from you I’m not shocked at all. Beyond sad that a very vocal group with you leading the charge act the way you do towards a QB who brought the city and team to relevancy. 

Look in All Pro and see for yourself.

And the notion that me or anybody else is "leading the charge" is just stupidity on your part. As has been said numerous times, talking about what might happen isn't the same as saying you want it to happen. Take the Joe Burrow trade talk. I acknowledge it's a possibility, but that doesn't mean I think we should do it.

That shouldn't really take a lot to understand that, but apparently it's over your head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Officially, you can't really talk about trades yet so I'd question that. Unofficially of course, everybody knows tampering happens so yeah, it's possible.

It's also valid that you can look back at multiple player trades and find team statements prior to the transaction that said things like "we're not even thinking about trading Player X" and/or "we hope Player X stays here for their whole career" and such, so practically speaking again, nothing is guaranteed.

Don’t worry everyone Mr. Scot already knew this info months ago, plus you can’t trust the source (Granted he did when they said Cam was gone) oh and history shows us teams say this stuff all the time then trade a player so really everyone direct your opinions and thoughts to Mr Scot as he is the only one who truly knows what’s happening even more so than Tepper, Rhule, Cam and Hurney. 
 

/thread

Mods I know you won’t do anything but this guy is pathetic. His thinly veiled poo towards Cam has gone on for way way too long. How many receipts are needed before him spouting the poo he says along with “MUH SOURCES” trying to act right will be allowed? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joeyxfresco said:

Yea I’m not one to play the convenience game. I won’t trust it unless I hear it from Tepper or Rhule. It was encouraging when Cam said it but like many have mentioned he doesn’t have final say. This is a good step forward but not the end all he all for the situation 

Honestly, even if they come out and say it directly, it doesn't guarantee anything. Plenty have teams come out and say "we're doing X" right before they do Y.

For me, I'll believe it for now but also acknowledge that anything is still possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WoahW said:

Don’t worry everyone Mr. Scot already knew this info months ago, plus you can’t trust the source (Granted he did when they said Cam was gone) oh and history shows us teams say this stuff all the time then trade a player so really everyone direct your opinions and thoughts to Mr Scot as he is the only one who truly knows what’s happening even more so than Tepper, Rhule, Cam and Hurney. 
 

/thread

Mods I know you won’t do anything but this guy is pathetic. His thinly veiled poo towards Cam has gone on for way way too long. How many receipts are needed before him spouting the poo he says along with “MUH SOURCES” trying to act right will be allowed? 

Bro you need to chill, dang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Look in All Pro and see for yourself.

And the notion that me or anybody else is "leading the charge" is just stupidity on your part. As has been said numerous times, yalking about what might happen isn't the same as saying you want it to happen. Take the Joe Burrow trade talk. I acknowledge it's a possibility, but that doesn't mean I think we should do it.

That shouldn't really take a lot to understand that, but apparently it's over your head.

No kid your poo posts where any chance you get Cam is gone is tiring, the shtick is old. No one cares what “roaring riot zack” said because he has as many sources as we do 0. Tepper is not letting some random fan club guy in on how he runs the team it’s just not happening. Why that’s so over your fuging head no one knows. Your boy could say Tepper stubbed his toe and you’d be shouting from the rooftops in defense of him no matter what.

Most rational people have said from the start unless you get a mass haul or a QB you fee is the next franchise QB you run with Cam.

• Your first excuse was some random poster saying Cecil would NEVER let Cam play on a one year prove it deal, Cam came out and said he would do anything to stay in Carolina ; Your response nope can’t be, once your boy says it “things have changed the Cam camp is good with it” months after Cam said he was good with it

• Cam needs to be healthy before any discussions are made per Tepper, Rhule, Hurney ; Your response “Well the fact they didn’t say he’ll be here another 15 years means he’s gone” 

You’ve done it over and over consistently changing when your “insider” a glorified fan club starter has said what is common sense. Just drop the act for god’s sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Bro you need to chill, dang

Nah man dude does this consistently I even acknowledge that if we get a king’s ransom he should be traded. This forum is filled with far too many “I’m just saying” poo posts when it comes to Cam. Why they are allowed who knows but it’s been happening since before he got drafted 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
    • Sorry, but this is a terrible breakdown that doesn't at all show what you're trying to say/project about T-Mac next year, as it leaves out key information that changes everything, it makes the opposite point that you're trying to. Chase missed 5 games that second season after playing all 17 as a rookie (and still saw more targets that second season). Puka it looks like you projected his stats out to a 17 game season (as he only played 11 games), but even still , when you have 160+ targets as a rookie, there isn't really much room to get any more the next year. Waddle saw an increase in yards, and sure, his targets went down, but he played on a team with a better WR that year who saw 170 targets for 1,710 yards during that 2nd season for Waddle... something T-Mac doesn't have to contend with on the same team (280+ targets for their top 2 WRs, if you don't think T-Mac would see more than 122 targets if him and Coker combined for 287, then you're nuts). Then Olave and Wilson both saw an increase of 19 targets in their second season. You basically just laid out the reasoning for why T-Mac should see at least 20 more targets next year, if not more, which would be a solid increase and put him easily into the Top 10 most targeted WR next season.
×
×
  • Create New...