Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why no talk about trading up to #3 for Tua?


Real1zOnly

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Pretty much sums it up for me. If you're considering moving on from Cam due to injury concerns then it doesn't make a lick of sense to trade up in the draft for a QB prospect with a significant injury history. Honestly, it doesn't make sense to take him at #7 if he's still there either.

The only difference would be cost (not moving up to do so).  It's a cheaper gamble on the rookie than it is the vet.  You could pick one without injury history of course but what would be the fun in that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The only difference would be cost (not moving up to do so).  It's a cheaper gamble on the rookie than it is the vet.  You could pick one without injury history of course but what would be the fun in that?

Opportunity cost is real though. We'll have to pass over a blue chip prospect at a position of major need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Opportunity cost is real though. We'll have to pass over a blue chip prospect at a position of major need.

I would classify a starting quality QB a major need.  Right now we don't have one.  We have two camp body's and a broken 5 year removed mvp who will never be the same.  We have a major need at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I would classify a starting quality QB a major need.  Right now we don't have one.  We have two camp body's and a broken 5 year removed mvp who will never be the same.  We have a major need at QB.

I don't think the answer is a broken younger QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think the answer is a broken younger QB.

Never said it was.  I just said they better find one ASAP.  If the plan is to count on Newton to be "healthy" (whatever that's supposed to mean) as your only option going into next season then it's a bad plan.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

If Burrow, Tua went 1,2, would you consider moving up for a player like Young? I look at him like Peppers, just head and shoulders above the rest.

Not me.  Stay put and take the BPA.  This team is FUBAR and one player will not fix it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

If Burrow, Tua went 1,2, would you consider moving up for a player like Young? I look at him like Peppers, just head and shoulders above the rest.

I think it'd cost more than I'd want to give up.

That's basically the same reason I'm not in favor of trading up for Burrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Look at that, we got a doctor in the house.

When did you perform a physical on Cam Newton?

He hasn’t ... nor has anyone else yet. He still can’t pass one... which is kind of the point? 
 

I’ve been saying I see ya giving Cam another year. But he’s gotta get healthy. That’s the question mark. He’s had a long time to recover and he’s still basically been hurt for like 3 years now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...