Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Yep. Deaths are going down, which shows spikes in cases does not correlate to deaths. 

A few things here.  Firstly and most importantly, the medical community knows how to treat this better than they did 3 months ago.  Initially, if people had a good amount of trouble breathing, a vent was the go-to method.  That has been shown to have horrendous results.  There are several methods of treating this now as long as the patients are not too advanced in their sickness.

Secondly, we know that testing was scarce initially and the number of tests were tied to those being admitted to the hospital for COVID-19...even then they were only taking the most dire cases.  Many of those people died.  So yes, the early deaths rates looked scary as heck!

Lastly, if you quarantine the entire country cases are going to be predictably less than not closing things down. However, society can't be cordoned off forever, so as the country reopened, of course cases were going to spike.  Minimizing exposure does NOT eradicate the virus, it just delays the inevitable until vaccine is developed and widely available.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Has it not been explained a million times that deaths lag cases by weeks

How many?

was 11 days, then 2 weeks, then 2-3 weeks.

Riots and protests and openings started 5 weeks ago.  Just sayin'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You have to have no understanding of statistics what so ever to arrive at a conclusion like this.

Look at the graphs I posted and give us all a lesson.  Really, if it is that simple, give the answers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You have to have no understanding of statistics what so ever to arrive at a conclusion like this.

Really? I just totally just took a shot in the dark at this comment? I have been following this Virus since March. Tell me.. is Positive Cases, Testing, and deaths equally correlated? Lets say deaths are are lagging by cases.. they still do not equally correlate. The improvements in testing, healthcare, experience, medicine has drastically lowered the death rate. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with most is that they mix their politics in with statistics, and it never adds up.

Okay, not many people, including me, think much of Trump.  So give it a rest.  Talk numbers and virus, not fear based opinions based on an election year.  Except for 4 Corners, he is a hopeless political case

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stirs said:

The problem with most is that they mix their politics in with statistics, and it never adds up.

Okay, not many people, including me, think much of Trump.  So give it a rest.  Talk numbers and virus, not fear based opinions based on an election year.  Except for 4 Corners, he is a hopeless political case

If the numbers from March and April, were the same in May and June. it would be totally different on the numbers and deaths etc. The news props up New Cases, but will not tell you how many recovered. The news props up how many have died, but does not tell you the percentage, or underlying causes. The news will also not tell you how many have had the anti-body test, how many does not experience symptoms, or tells you the probability of living. It is all death, death, sickness, gloom and death. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stirs said:

The problem with most is that they mix their politics in with statistics, and it never adds up.

Okay, not many people, including me, think much of Trump.  So give it a rest.  Talk numbers and virus, not fear based opinions based on an election year.  Except for 4 Corners, he is a hopeless political case

Not going to happen, so don't count on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

If the numbers from March and April, were the same in May and June. it would be totally different on the numbers and deaths etc. The news props up New Cases, but will not tell you how many recovered. The news props up how many have died, but does not tell you the percentage, or underlying causes. The news will also not tell you how many have had the anti-body test, how many does not experience symptoms, or tells you the probability of living. It is all death, death, sickness, gloom and death. 

 

It's amazing the number of outlets where you can easily find accumulative case counts and number of deaths, but you have to really dig to find the number of recovered cases.    Secondly, you would think total case count (while important) would be secondary to the active case count.  But, you know, that doesn't drive headlines and fear mongering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hornets shooting has definitely cooled off to end the season 
    • Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't, draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
×
×
  • Create New...