Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, stirs said:

Why can so many people fail to understand that pandemics experience exponential growth? We're only at the very beginning of this thing. If people would stop sticking their fuging heads in the sand then maybe we can actually take the necessary steps to significantly mitigate the spread and avoid a complete fuging disaster. It's gonna suck ass in the short term, but we'll be a helluva lot better off in the long-term to suck it up and mitigate the fug out of this thing rather than take half ass measures and hope for the best because that poo ain't gonna work and if our healthcare system gets overrun then that's also gonna mean that a helluva lot more people are gonna die from those other conditions he mentioned because there's not gonna be any medical assistance available for them with everyone dealing with COVID-19 patients.

/rant off

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Why can so many people fail to understand that pandemics experience exponential growth? We're only at the very beginning of this thing. If people would stop sticking their fuging heads in the sand then maybe we can actually take the necessary steps to significantly mitigate the spread and avoid a complete fuging disaster. It's gonna suck ass in the short term, but we'll be a helluva lot better off in the long-term to suck it up and mitigate the fug out of this thing rather than take half ass measures and hope for the best because that poo ain't gonna work and if our healthcare system gets overrun then that's also gonna mean that a helluva lot more people are gonna die from those other conditions he mentioned because there's not gonna be any medical assistance available for them with everyone dealing with COVID-19 patients.

/rant off

China heading in the right direction now.  Their death rate is around 3.9.  Ours is 2.1 currently and we are learning by watching them.

I don't see the million death situation that many are saying, or 1.7 million that has been put out in the press for us.  Maybe so, but it's not in the numbers currently and w the restrictions........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, stirs said:

 

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Why can so many people fail to understand that pandemics experience exponential growth? We're only at the very beginning of this thing. If people would stop sticking their fuging heads in the sand then maybe we can actually take the necessary steps to significantly mitigate the spread and avoid a complete fuging disaster. It's gonna suck ass in the short term, but we'll be a helluva lot better off in the long-term to suck it up and mitigate the fug out of this thing rather than take half ass measures and hope for the best because that poo ain't gonna work and if our healthcare system gets overrun then that's also gonna mean that a helluva lot more people are gonna die from those other conditions he mentioned because there's not gonna be any medical assistance available for them with everyone dealing with COVID-19 patients.

/rant off

A few problems here.

This is very much like the gun control argument that car crashes kill as much as guns maybe we should ban them too. We spend millions or billions on making cars safe and one has to go through regulatory hoops to own one.

We also spend millions or billions on mitigating things like heart disease and cancer. And the healthcare system is ready to battle those things daily. It is not ready to be overwhelmed by a pandemic.

If you told me a new cancer was here that would kill an extra 100M* Americans in the next twelve months I think we would want to do something about it.

*I don't know what the number will be but its a possibility,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, stirs said:

China heading in the right direction now.  Their death rate is around 3.9.  Ours is 2.1 currently and we are learning by watching them.

I don't see the million death situation that many are saying, or 1.7 million that has been put out in the press for us.  Maybe so, but it's not in the numbers currently and w the restrictions........

I hope we don't see it. With proper mitigation efforts we very well might.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, stirs said:

China heading in the right direction now.  Their death rate is around 3.9.  Ours is 2.1 currently and we are learning by watching them.

I don't see the million death situation that many are saying, or 1.7 million that has been put out in the press for us.  Maybe so, but it's not in the numbers currently and w the restrictions........

Well if we take action maybe we won’t have those crazy numbers... if we dont we likely will. And I think that’s the point.  For once the media frenzy is actually necessary.  I mean, if we look back on this in 3-4 months and it a punchline... I’m ok with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stirs said:

Like Tom, a lot of people have a terrible time assessing risk.

You see this with hurricanes. There are always people who say the risk is overblown and they stay home because “very few people die in these storms”.
 

Well yeah, because people leave. What would happen if everyone stayed and did nothing?

Same with this. What would happen if nothing was done? Italy x 10 would happen. 
 

You wouldn’t tell a cancer patient that their disease is no big deal because way more people die in car accidents. No, you take the appropriate steps (drastic if required) to stop the threat.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Like Tom, a lot of people have a terrible time assessing risk.

You see this with hurricanes. There are always people who say the risk is overblown and they stay home because “very few people die in these storms”.
 

Well yeah, because people leave. What would happen if everyone stayed and did nothing?

Same with this. What would happen if nothing was done? Italy x 10 would happen. 
 

You wouldn’t tell a cancer patient that their disease is no big deal because way more people die in car accidents. No, you take the appropriate steps (drastic if required) to stop the threat.

Don't think we tell cancer patients its not big deal, but we also don't tell everyone they are necessarily going to get cancer.  I think that is what he is saying, but then again, I don't really care for him, so it's easy for me to thumb my nose to him.

To me, if China was not turning around in really dramatic ways, I would have a much more jaded outlook, but it can be done and I think mitigation and warmer weather, all bode well for us.

There are also new reports out however that say some people present with GI difficulties and not so much the lung issues.  That will throw a monkey wrench into a lot of efforts.  Guess it's good people getting that toilet paper.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, not reading through 26 pages, but have you guys seen/heard where China is attempting to blame the US for this?  Their leaders say a contingent of US officials were in Wuhan province-China is September and brought it with them. If you read between the lines, not accidentally, but as a direct act of bio-terrorism.

Hey China, how about put some restrictions/regulations (ex: health codes) on your wet markets and this crap will be cut down dramatically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, stirs said:

Don't think we tell cancer patients its not big deal, but we also don't tell everyone they are necessarily going to get cancer.  I think that is what he is saying, but then again, I don't really care for him, so it's easy for me to thumb my nose to him.

To me, if China was not turning around in really dramatic ways, I would have a much more jaded outlook, but it can be done and I think mitigation and warmer weather, all bode well for us.

There are also new reports out however that say some people present with GI difficulties and not so much the lung issues.  That will throw a monkey wrench into a lot of efforts.  Guess it's good people getting that toilet paper.

 

Absolutely, it can be done and I think it will be done. 
 

A lot of people think this is nothing more than the flu and we don’t need to take all these precautions. To me, that is what Tom is getting at. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stirs said:

Don't think we tell cancer patients its not big deal, but we also don't tell everyone they are necessarily going to get cancer.  I think that is what he is saying, but then again, I don't really care for him, so it's easy for me to thumb my nose to him.

To me, if China was not turning around in really dramatic ways, I would have a much more jaded outlook, but it can be done and I think mitigation and warmer weather, all bode well for us.

There are also new reports out however that say some people present with GI difficulties and not so much the lung issues.  That will throw a monkey wrench into a lot of efforts.  Guess it's good people getting that toilet paper.

 

Well, cancer isn't contagious either.

I agree with you though. I'm not all doom and gloom about this, but people do have to take this seriously and get serious about taking aggressive mitigation efforts.

I do think we're going to go through a period of ugliness though. Hopefully not as bad as Italy due to our younger and less concentrated population. The nightmare scenario for America would be a major outbreak somewhere like NYC. It'll be interesting to watch Seattle.

I do think there's hope that the virus will be less contagious during the summer. Early studies show that it's most contagious around 8.7 degrees Celsius (roughly 48 degrees Fahrenheit) with fairly significant drop-off as temperatures climb from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
×
×
  • Create New...