Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Todd Gurley


WarHeel

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We need somebody to take some carries away from CMC. Dude's tires are gonna be bald before he gets to his second NFL contract at last year's pace.

Gurley is probably my favorite back second to CMC but what kind of price tag would he demand? Even with the knee trouble I’m assuming it’ll be steep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We need somebody to take some carries away from CMC. Dude's tires are gonna be bald before he gets to his second NFL contract at last year's pace.

Gurley's a long way from what he used to be. Last year the Rams primarily used him late in games.

He's basically a short yardage back at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He still had 800+ yards and his skills are a good compliment to CMC's.

Possibly, but the knock on him when he was drafted was that he'd been so heavily used and battered in college that people feared he'd have a short shelf life in the NFL.

That prediction looks to be coming true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a question.  Could Coby White be a solid replacement for Ball? Seems he could be an upgrade. Seems he played well in replacement of Ball.  I normally get the highlights and don't get to see any games but I liked when White was on on the court. 
    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
×
×
  • Create New...