Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy Bridgewater vs. the Field


kungfoodude

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would take Stafford or Wentz for sure. I do realize that Wentz has a Mr. Glass sort of history, so I can understand being concerned from that aspect.

Stafford is a playoff choke artist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

I would take Teddy over Carr, Darnold, and Foles too. Other than that I agree, though I am still not 100% sold on Burrow, time will tell

Those are close races, IMO. A lot of the middle tier QB's are pretty close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talent wise Bridgewater may not be tops in the league, but it's been proven you don't need an extremely talented QB to win games in this league.  If the coaches play to his strengths he will turn out fine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Anyone trying to argue Bridgewater > Stafford needs to pursue a career in stand up comedy because that's hilarious.

Stafford just gets ragged on because he is on a loser franchise. Had he ended up on a good franchise, he might be regarded as an elite QB. Is he worse than Prescott? Prescott gets mentioned by some as being elite. I'd probably rather have Stafford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Talent wise Bridgewater may not be tops in the league, but it's been proven you don't need an extremely talented QB to win games in this league.  If the coaches play to his strengths he will turn out fine

Bridgewater can be successful. He was in Minnesota and in New Orleans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

Except Darnold, I have never seen anything to like about him

Eh.....I sort of want to believe in his talent level but that was one I thought about quite a bit. It's more of a gamble on his upside than anything. I could easily accept most arguments to take Bridgewater over him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He can be successful if he's surrounded by an elite team. I think he's just a placeholder for us to help install Brady's offense.

He's a pretty good game managing QB. I think he is a guy that will pretty much rely on a strong team to be able to win. We'll get that answer definitively in Carolina because we are a team currently built to lose early and often. If he changes that narrative over the course of a season, then perhaps I will buy into him as more than just a game manager type. 

All he can do is prove us right or wrong at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...