Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Wont partake in Trevor Lawerence sweepstakes


ncfan

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Julio said:

As opposed to winning every time in the playoffs like we have been doing? The Saints actually won a Super Bowl and have been a perennial powerhouse for much of the past decade, so yeah what they’re doing is working much better. 

When have they gotten back to the SuperBowl?

A lot of flash and hype and they end up duds. I'll take our success and two SB trips any day.

Sean Payton has yet to prove that he can get back to the big game. And yeah, our franchise has been to the pinnacle twice.

I didnt want to mention Katrina but yeah, NFL loves a good storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rippadonn said:

When have they gotten back to the SuperBowl?

A lot of flash and hype and they end up duds. I'll take our success and two SB trips any day.

Sean Payton has yet to prove that he can get back to the big game. And yeah, our franchise has been to the pinnacle twice.

I didnt want to mention Katrina but yeah, NFL loves a good storyline.

Sweet Jesus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

fired a horrible coach, set the process in motion to upgrade facilities and infrastructure,  hired a well thought of head coach and OC.   I could go on but its your turn

Fired a good HC that thinks mediocrely. Then hires a HC from college who has not prove that he can win in the NFL to a $60 m contract. Was successful in bringing a MLS soccer team during our terrible season. Cut Cam Newton’s 19m contract and then give a mediocre game manager Teddy Bridgewater more. Has 12 wins in two seasons as the owner and seen zero playoff game. Helped made Panthers fans not have to sit all night waiting for the Panthers pick in the last two drafts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MMA said:

Fired a good HC that thinks mediocrely. Then hires a HC from college who has not prove that he can win in the NFL to a $60 m contract. Was successful in bringing a MLS soccer team during our terrible season. Cut Cam Newton’s 19m contract and then give a mediocre game manager Teddy Bridgewater more. Has 12 wins in two seasons as the owner and seen zero playoff game. Helped made Panthers fans not have to sit all night waiting for the Panthers pick in the last two drafts. 

Oh, you are still mad about cam.  Got it.   Spoiler alert, he still hasnt signed with another team.  Maybe there is something more going on with him than you care to acknowledge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Oh, you are still mad about cam.  Got it.   Spoiler alert, he still hasnt signed with another team.  Maybe there is something more going on with him than you care to acknowledge

I was one of the few guys that biatch and cried on here about not wanting Cam back. But cutting Cam and signing Teddy is just insanely stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said 6 wins several weeks back.  Will stick to it.  We will pick around 10th.

Between Rhules motivation(which remains to be seen in the NFL level), the WR's mentioned, the Oline changes, and the emphasis on D, the Panthers could actually surprise us all.  Teddy can run Bradys offense much better for the same price tag that Cam could, so they go with a guy with a bad knee, but healthy shoulder.  The NFC South could be a major struggle for us, but we could beat Atlanta once or even twice.  Early season will be filled with mistakes, but enthusiastic ones.  As long as I don't hope for anything, will be fun to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

offense got better, defense got worse

an injury to either, especially the offense, and were 100% in the running for lawrence. were already in contention for fields

i love this team but its going to be another offseason or two before were really dangerous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, blackcat said:

The games against Chicago and Detroit will be the only games we win.

lol this defense littered with rookies and JAGs against matthew stafford? we'd get absolutely shredded unless stafford gets hurt again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...