Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC vs Davis illustrated


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Here is a good example of what Mike Davis offers vs what Christian McCaffrey offers as a running back. 

 

1st and 10 on the Chargers 19. 

giphy.gif

If CMC was in at tailback here, it is a touchdown. That is a huge hole to run through leaving only a single safety to shake between him and the end zone. 

So enough with the "trade CMC" talk. It is embarrassing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Davis is a very good compliment to a back like CMC. Anyone clamoring to trade him is stupid. My thing is, if the Panthers are say, 1-5 when McCaffrey is healthy enough to come back, is it worth playing him this season? He’s already an elite player and doesn’t need snaps. He needs wear and tear preservation. 

Is it worth playing him in a down year? Especially if he’s dealing with ankle injuries that are notorious to linger?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

 1-5 when McCaffrey is healthy enough to come back, is it worth playing him this season? He’s already an elite player and doesn’t need snaps. He needs wear and tear preservation. 

CMC isn't the type of guy that will want to sit and watch his team play. Aside from team goals, he has personal goals as well. To strip him of that may not be wise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

Mike Davis is a very good compliment to a back like CMC. Anyone clamoring to trade him is stupid. My thing is, if the Panthers are say, 1-5 when McCaffrey is healthy enough to come back, is it worth playing him this season? He’s already an elite player and doesn’t need snaps. He needs wear and tear preservation. 

Is it worth playing him in a down year? Especially if he’s dealing with ankle injuries that are notorious to linger?

That is really a ridiculous question. Of course you play him if he is healthy. It is an insult to him and every other player to hold out someone who is healthy because they might get hurt unless we have wrapped up the playoffs and are sitting players waiting for the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Mike Davis is a very good compliment to a back like CMC. Anyone clamoring to trade him is stupid. My thing is, if the Panthers are say, 1-5 when McCaffrey is healthy enough to come back, is it worth playing him this season? He’s already an elite player and doesn’t need snaps. He needs wear and tear preservation. 

Is it worth playing him in a down year? Especially if he’s dealing with ankle injuries that are notorious to linger?

No you cant sit CMC, makes too much money to not play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Davis has his role, he's just... slow. I'd be 90% sure that bonnafon would have made it to the endzone on that play.

Davis is slow to the hole. He had a 25 yard run because the hole was 5 times that size. He was 12-24 the rest of the time. Bonnafon had 2 carries and even I could see he was way more explosive than Davis. We scored 21 points even though the Chargers played about as bad as it gets and even then our offensive efficiency almost let them win the game on the last play.

The Davis over CMC talk is downright embarrassing. The studs make a lot more than JAGs. It will always be that way.

Amazing the amount of people wanting to get rid of CMC and I got grief from a lot of the same saying we should have cut Short. Short’s cap hit this year is equal to CMC’s cap hit this year and next year. CMC is on a 3 year $39M deal if we see any decline in 2022.

SMH, I think I could do better than Hurney but man some of these people would have Short and Davis next year instead of CMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Davis is slow to the hole. He had a 25 yard run because the hole was 5 times that size. He was 12-24 the rest of the time. Bonnafon had 2 carries and even I could see he was way more explosive than Davis. We scored 21 points even though the Chargers played about as bad as it gets and even then our offensive efficiency almost let them win the game on the last play.

The Davis over CMC talk is downright embarrassing. The studs make a lot more than JAGs. It will always be that way.

Amazing the amount of people wanting to get rid of CMC and I got grief from a lot of the same saying we should have cut Short. Short’s cap hit this year is equal to CMC’s cap hit this year and next year. CMC is on a 3 year $39M deal if we see any decline in 2022.

SMH, I think I could do better than Hurney but man some of these people would have Short and Davis next year instead of CMC.

I really see Davis as the Greg Olsen of this generations passing game. Solid hands, slow but keeps his feet moving, good power back that should do more of the up the middle poo when CMC is lined up as WR. Unfortunately though I haven't been all that impressed with his blocking when challenged by a good DL he straight up wiffed a lot of poo vs the Bucs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

I really see Davis as the Greg Olsen of this generations passing game. Solid hands, slow but keeps his feet moving, good power back that should do more of the up the middle poo when CMC is lined up as WR. Unfortunately though I haven't been all that impressed with his blocking when challenged by a good DL he straight up wiffed a lot of poo vs the Bucs. 

You must only be thinking of late career Olsen. Prime Olsen definitely wasn't slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Davis is a good #2 RB. I still don't understand paying a #2 RB $3M in today's NFL. Everyone else is spending their money on WRs, DBs, and OTs. We're still spending all of our money on RBs and LBs like it's 1984.

What I don't get is why we even picked Davis up in reality. Ya, he's a solid player he proved that to me Sunday(Finally got his chance) but we literally had a stable of young potential RB's for way cheaper last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...