Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC vs Davis illustrated


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Here is a good example of what Mike Davis offers vs what Christian McCaffrey offers as a running back. 

 

1st and 10 on the Chargers 19. 

giphy.gif

If CMC was in at tailback here, it is a touchdown. That is a huge hole to run through leaving only a single safety to shake between him and the end zone. 

So enough with the "trade CMC" talk. It is embarrassing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Davis is a very good compliment to a back like CMC. Anyone clamoring to trade him is stupid. My thing is, if the Panthers are say, 1-5 when McCaffrey is healthy enough to come back, is it worth playing him this season? He’s already an elite player and doesn’t need snaps. He needs wear and tear preservation. 

Is it worth playing him in a down year? Especially if he’s dealing with ankle injuries that are notorious to linger?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

 1-5 when McCaffrey is healthy enough to come back, is it worth playing him this season? He’s already an elite player and doesn’t need snaps. He needs wear and tear preservation. 

CMC isn't the type of guy that will want to sit and watch his team play. Aside from team goals, he has personal goals as well. To strip him of that may not be wise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

Mike Davis is a very good compliment to a back like CMC. Anyone clamoring to trade him is stupid. My thing is, if the Panthers are say, 1-5 when McCaffrey is healthy enough to come back, is it worth playing him this season? He’s already an elite player and doesn’t need snaps. He needs wear and tear preservation. 

Is it worth playing him in a down year? Especially if he’s dealing with ankle injuries that are notorious to linger?

That is really a ridiculous question. Of course you play him if he is healthy. It is an insult to him and every other player to hold out someone who is healthy because they might get hurt unless we have wrapped up the playoffs and are sitting players waiting for the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Mike Davis is a very good compliment to a back like CMC. Anyone clamoring to trade him is stupid. My thing is, if the Panthers are say, 1-5 when McCaffrey is healthy enough to come back, is it worth playing him this season? He’s already an elite player and doesn’t need snaps. He needs wear and tear preservation. 

Is it worth playing him in a down year? Especially if he’s dealing with ankle injuries that are notorious to linger?

No you cant sit CMC, makes too much money to not play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Davis has his role, he's just... slow. I'd be 90% sure that bonnafon would have made it to the endzone on that play.

Davis is slow to the hole. He had a 25 yard run because the hole was 5 times that size. He was 12-24 the rest of the time. Bonnafon had 2 carries and even I could see he was way more explosive than Davis. We scored 21 points even though the Chargers played about as bad as it gets and even then our offensive efficiency almost let them win the game on the last play.

The Davis over CMC talk is downright embarrassing. The studs make a lot more than JAGs. It will always be that way.

Amazing the amount of people wanting to get rid of CMC and I got grief from a lot of the same saying we should have cut Short. Short’s cap hit this year is equal to CMC’s cap hit this year and next year. CMC is on a 3 year $39M deal if we see any decline in 2022.

SMH, I think I could do better than Hurney but man some of these people would have Short and Davis next year instead of CMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Davis is slow to the hole. He had a 25 yard run because the hole was 5 times that size. He was 12-24 the rest of the time. Bonnafon had 2 carries and even I could see he was way more explosive than Davis. We scored 21 points even though the Chargers played about as bad as it gets and even then our offensive efficiency almost let them win the game on the last play.

The Davis over CMC talk is downright embarrassing. The studs make a lot more than JAGs. It will always be that way.

Amazing the amount of people wanting to get rid of CMC and I got grief from a lot of the same saying we should have cut Short. Short’s cap hit this year is equal to CMC’s cap hit this year and next year. CMC is on a 3 year $39M deal if we see any decline in 2022.

SMH, I think I could do better than Hurney but man some of these people would have Short and Davis next year instead of CMC.

I really see Davis as the Greg Olsen of this generations passing game. Solid hands, slow but keeps his feet moving, good power back that should do more of the up the middle poo when CMC is lined up as WR. Unfortunately though I haven't been all that impressed with his blocking when challenged by a good DL he straight up wiffed a lot of poo vs the Bucs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

I really see Davis as the Greg Olsen of this generations passing game. Solid hands, slow but keeps his feet moving, good power back that should do more of the up the middle poo when CMC is lined up as WR. Unfortunately though I haven't been all that impressed with his blocking when challenged by a good DL he straight up wiffed a lot of poo vs the Bucs. 

You must only be thinking of late career Olsen. Prime Olsen definitely wasn't slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Davis is a good #2 RB. I still don't understand paying a #2 RB $3M in today's NFL. Everyone else is spending their money on WRs, DBs, and OTs. We're still spending all of our money on RBs and LBs like it's 1984.

What I don't get is why we even picked Davis up in reality. Ya, he's a solid player he proved that to me Sunday(Finally got his chance) but we literally had a stable of young potential RB's for way cheaper last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Scourton's interviews are telling to me that it's only a matter of time before he could really put it together.  His limitation tool-wise that I see is in his bend, but at the leaner size, it looks like it wasn't a problem at Purdue.   He has a good moveset and reads leverages very well (vet level well).  Plays both the speed/quickness (great change of direction) and has a power game with good hand usage.  Moves from what I've seen in my digs: I'm seeing cross-chop, fake crossers into bull, bull rush, spin (his preferred move of choice), hand shuck.  He's not unrefined by any means.   If he can do 2 things---I'm feeling confident from seeing his interviews that we have a real dude on our hands: 1) Diversifying his moveset/how it's deployed - Over-reliant on some, but again, he has a growing palette.  And is already great with his hands so things are in-place to coach up. 2) Developing a counter moveset and starting to play the chess game with an OT - He's very good at reading leverage, knowing when to change things up during a play.  But NFL coaching should start to teach him how to really create a plan based on an opponent.  What to throw at a guy first, how to confuse with fakes/counters, etc.  How to play against these tackles as a game progresses.   Overall, he has some things that give me serious optimism: Run Defense, speed moves, power moves, he's super young and has the size/length.  When you really spell it all out, I think we should get excited.  Temper expectations from a stat sheet standpoint, but he should be able to go in and make an impact.    
    • Scourton may not get double digit sacks, but he won't be a liability on every other down
×
×
  • Create New...