Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tre Boston led the team in tackles yesterday.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

It was weird...  I was talking to a my Bears' fan friend and he was saying he didn't notice Burns much after I had been telling him how great he was looking.  I told him it was because they neutralized him by getting the ball out quick on those smoke screens, motion flares, and the stick routes into the holes in the zone.  Then as I was discussing that, I realized how weird it was that I hardly saw Chinn running the plays down he usually does.  But, I think it was for the same reasons...  all those horizontal plays to each side of the field and how quickly they were getting it out when they threw it past the LOS, it not only neutralized the pass rush, but it kept guys like Chinn from easily tracking the ball and running to it downhill. 

They had a helluva gameplan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

It was weird...  I was talking to a my Bears' fan friend and he was saying he didn't notice Burns much after I had been telling him how great he was looking.  I told him it was because they neutralized him by getting the ball out quick on those smoke screens, motion flares, and the stick routes into the holes in the zone.  Then as I was discussing that, I realized how weird it was that I hardly saw Chinn running the plays down he usually does.  But, I think it was for the same reasons...  all those horizontal plays to each side of the field and how quickly they were getting it out when they threw it past the LOS, it not only neutralized the pass rush, but it kept guys like Chinn from easily tracking the ball and running to it downhill. 

They had a helluva gameplan.

It's an Andy Reid style game plan.

(similar concepts to what we do)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

It was weird...  I was talking to a my Bears' fan friend and he was saying he didn't notice Burns much after I had been telling him how great he was looking.  I told him it was because they neutralized him by getting the ball out quick on those smoke screens, motion flares, and the stick routes into the holes in the zone.  Then as I was discussing that, I realized how weird it was that I hardly saw Chinn running the plays down he usually does.  But, I think it was for the same reasons...  all those horizontal plays to each side of the field and how quickly they were getting it out when they threw it past the LOS, it not only neutralized the pass rush, but it kept guys like Chinn from easily tracking the ball and running to it downhill. 

They had a helluva gameplan.

Burns was dropped back into coverage way more than I'd ever want to see again. The sad part is he is better in coverage than Tahir and Shaq combined.

We miss you Luke :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a positive note Larkin (96) was flying around all game long and was giving the type of effort we have sorely missed. With time, he looked like he turn into something, also Weatherly has been quietly a legit run stopping DE we haven't had since CJ. The future is looking way better than I originally thought for this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Daniel Jeremiah's top 50 players heading into the Combine.  Lol at the people still pining for Styles.  Dude will be LONG gone before our slot as I noted he would be.  Go ahead a keep drafting him at #19 if y'all want to keep ruining/making unrealistic mock drafts.   https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-s-top-50-2026-nfl-draft-prospect-rankings-2-0
    • Kmet is better than just 'meh'.   Mayer took a back seat to Bowers and is another TE that would relish a chance to start again.  Sanders, Temble and Evans is a better group of TEs than we've fielded during the Ian Thomas era, but it's far from stacked.  That's the problem, our TE room has sucked for so long now that  being 'better than crap' is apparently good enough--which it is not.
    • Why? Feels like we got a whole TE crew of almost Kmets. Loveland surpassed Kmet easy and relegated Kmet to Tremble like stats. Kmet’s decent years were because of volume. Kmet had over 90 targets twice in his career. Tremble’s career high in targets is 37. Tremble could produce Kmet numbers with the same volume so why would you ever go for Kmet? Loveland or Bowers type studs, go for it. Meh TEs, we’ve got plenty.
×
×
  • Create New...