Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assuming Fox is gone, do you want to keep Meeks?


Zod

Should we keep Meeks?  

111 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we keep Meeks?

    • Heck Yes
      50
    • Heck No
      8
    • Depends on who is Head Coach
      40
    • warm moist apple pie
      13


Recommended Posts

We gave up 6 turnovers to the Saints and they scored only 30 points...

hard to complain about.

usually giving up 30 points to a team is a bad thing....if we had a real QB and cut down on the turnovers we would be 8-0...lol guess every team would say that..haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say it completely depends on the new Head Coach and his game philosophy. If by some twist of fate we got say... Tony Dungy then I would definitely say keep Meeks. If we get someone other than Dungy then it really just depends on how the HC wants to play ball.

Though I must admit I am liking what Meeks is doing to the defense overall. I think with speed and intelligence it works well, so long as the front four can pressure through the OL and a RB blocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...