Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No structural damage for Teddy. Status uncertain for Sunday.


trueblade

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

And? I'm okay with that. The more losses the better chance at getting a QB that isn't Teddy freaking Bridgewater. 

Lol I don't care if he does or not.  Just thought he was implying that Walker would somehow be able to hit Moore deep accuratelty and consistently, or at least any better than Teddy does.  Not a Teddy fan but Walker is definitely worse.  

I'm cool if he started though.  Get that top 3 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mage said:

Lol I don't care if he does or not.  Just thought he was implying that Walker would somehow be able to hit Moore deep accuratelty and consistently, or at least any better than Teddy does.  Not a Teddy fan but Walker is definitely worse.  

Oh wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy worse. Both options behind Bridgewater are ass. We would be right there with the Jets if either or were starting from the get go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Dude hasn't even started a game yet. Bridgewater isn't winning us any games right now, throw some sh*t at the wall and see what happens at this point. 

Walker has looked absolutely panic stricken every time he's seen the field. He has a better arm than Teddy but that's pretty much it. He's looked absolutely terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is we're are about to start a 3 game stretch against teams that are so bad that they might be intentionally tanking. What's worse is that unless the Saints start losing they are going to rest their starters against us to insure we drop in the draft. It's a Saints tradition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...