Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The fourth quarter of the Schedule

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Denver:  After a Sunday night battle with Kansas City, the Broncos stay on the road to visit Charlotte.  The Panthers are opening as 4-point favorites. Lock is playing for his future, it seems, and I expect him to look at the secondary and salivate--a chance to get Jerry Jeudy involved.  The Panthers probably get CMC back.  This should be a very close game, but I think Carolina wins at home and moves to 5-8.

@Green Bay: Rogers has been in the Zone this year, and he will be playing to win a first round bye from New Orleans.  With Minnesota, Detroit, and Chicago in their division, their record is probably better than the team is.  Rogers in Green Bay in December does not bode well for Southern teams with a QB from the state of Florida.  Carolina will drop to 5-9.

@ Washington: Washington has 4 wins to date, wins vs. Dallas (2), Philly, and Cincinnati.  These 3 opponents are 8-25-2 so far. The Football Team is still in the race for a playoff spot, so who knows how motivated they will be on December 27?  This game can go either way, but I see the Panthers coming out on top and moving to 6-9.

New Orleans:  The Saints play the Eagles, Chiefs, and Vikings before this game; it is reasonable to assume that they will win 2 of these games fairly easily (although Minnesota plays New Orleans tough, historically).  So if New Orleans enters the game at 12-3, and Green Bay (Detroit, Carolina, Tennessee, and Chicago) beats the Lions, Panthers, and loses to Tennessee in Green Bay, then the Packers would be 11-4.  Since Green Bay beat the Saints week 3, they would win a head to head IF they beat the Bears week 17 and New Orleans lost to Carolina.  So New Orleans needs to be 2 games ahead of Green Bay entering Week 17 to have the first-round bye locked up.  That seems somewhat unlikely. The Panthers lose to New Orleans and end the season at 6-10. 

For those of you hoping to see the team tank, Denver and Washington are formidable obstacles--I see the Panthers with CMC and a healthy QB, being favored slightly in both games.  I am not confident that the Panthers will win either, but the odds are that they will win 1 or both.

However, if the Saints are not competing for the first-round bye by entering week 17 a game behind Green Bay (unlikely), they could play scrubs as they have in the past and assist another Panther victory.  In that case, the Panthers could finish as high as 7-9.  Remember, the Panthers played New Orleans tough earlier this season, so stranger things...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

We’re not winning again this year. Which, IIRC, would make the Panthers 1-11 in December games under Tepper. 

lol @ blaming Tepper for our December record. I don't think there is a single owner in the NFL that would have a better record based on what we have been fielding for talent the last two years. It's not Tepper tackling or passing on Sundays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I've never been convinced a team tried to lose a game in the NFL....until yesterday.  That final play of the Jets game.  The Jets intentionally ran a defensive coverage to maximize the Raiders ability to pull off the upset.   No doubt.    No NFL team runs 4 men in man coverage on a hail marry lob w/ no S help.   

I've seen them install players that give them less of a chance.  Never seen coaches call plays to cater to the opponent like that.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, CRA said:

I've never been convinced a team tried to lose a game in the NFL....until yesterday.  That final play of the Jets game.  The Jets intentionally ran a defensive coverage to maximize the Raiders ability to pull off the upset.   No doubt.    No NFL team runs 4 men in man coverage on a hail marry lob w/ no S help.   

I've seen them install players that give them less of a chance.  Never seen coaches call plays to cater to the opponent like that.   

 

That is a very interesting point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Denver:  After a Sunday night battle with Kansas City, the Broncos stay on the road to visit Charlotte.  The Panthers are opening as 4-point favorites. Lock is playing for his future, it seems, and I expect him to look at the secondary and salivate--a chance to get Jerry Jeudy involved.  The Panthers probably get CMC back.  This should be a very close game, but I think Carolina wins at home and moves to 5-8.

@Green Bay: Rogers has been in the Zone this year, and he will be playing to win a first round bye from New Orleans.  With Minnesota, Detroit, and Chicago in their division, their record is probably better than the team is.  Rogers in Green Bay in December does not bode well for Southern teams with a QB from the state of Florida.  Carolina will drop to 5-9.

@ Washington: Washington has 4 wins to date, wins vs. Dallas (2), Philly, and Cincinnati.  These 3 opponents are 8-25-2 so far. The Football Team is still in the race for a playoff spot, so who knows how motivated they will be on December 27?  This game can go either way, but I see the Panthers coming out on top and moving to 6-9.

New Orleans:  The Saints play the Eagles, Chiefs, and Vikings before this game; it is reasonable to assume that they will win 2 of these games fairly easily (although Minnesota plays New Orleans tough, historically).  So if New Orleans enters the game at 12-3, and Green Bay (Detroit, Carolina, Tennessee, and Chicago) beats the Lions, Panthers, and loses to Tennessee in Green Bay, then the Packers would be 11-4.  Since Green Bay beat the Saints week 3, they would win a head to head IF they beat the Bears week 17 and New Orleans lost to Carolina.  So New Orleans needs to be 2 games ahead of Green Bay entering Week 17 to have the first-round bye locked up.  That seems somewhat unlikely. The Panthers lose to New Orleans and end the season at 6-10. 

For those of you hoping to see the team tank, Denver and Washington are formidable obstacles--I see the Panthers with CMC and a healthy QB, being favored slightly in both games.  I am not confident that the Panthers will win either, but the odds are that they will win 1 or both.

However, if the Saints are not competing for the first-round bye by entering week 17 a game behind Green Bay (unlikely), they could play scrubs as they have in the past and assist another Panther victory.  In that case, the Panthers could finish as high as 7-9.  Remember, the Panthers played New Orleans tough earlier this season, so stranger things...

 

half baked boo GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      For starters, and again I am not sure what his capacity is in the media or how connected he is to the team, but I posted above Al Wallace says he is "absolutely" getting 50+ a year and he deserves it.  I obviously strongly disagree with it but it feels like like season when the team is slow leaking info to gauge the temp.   Secondly nobody on Gods green earth is going to sign an extension making less than he is making now.  Thats just crazy talk.  
    • LinvilleGorge
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • SmokinwithWilly
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
×
×
  • Create New...