Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you want the Panthers to win any more games?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Of course I want us to win every game and would be pissed if the team laid down and quit. That would be a terrible indictment of Rhule. 

But I know the team is going to.play hard the rest of the year as many guys are trying to impress the coaches. And what I think had no impact on what the team does.

And I am grateful we are still playing football in this pandemic. Never thought we would get this far. I am really enjoying each game each game. Except for the prevent defense collapses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Washington has one of the best defenses in the league and probably the best dline in the league.  They are far from trash and will give our offense fits

every team in the nfl has pockets of talents, even the garbage ones

 

but bruh they're 5-7 while playing in the worst division in football and haven't won a playoff game since 2005. they're fugging garbage, granted the panthers are too, but it's at the very least a winnable game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

every team in the nfl has pockets of talents, even the garbage ones

 

but bruh they're 5-7 while playing in the worst division in football and haven't won a playoff game since 2005. they're fugging garbage, granted the panthers are too, but it's at the very least a winnable game

Probably the same thing the Steelers thought.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Probably the same thing the Steelers thought.....

yeah it's the nfl, bad teams are capable of squeaking out close one score victories against good teams

not sure what point you think you're making here

 

btw this is the same team that lost to the fugging lions (lulz), the cardinals and the giants... twice. better go ahead and chalk up an automatic loss i guess right? can't possibly beat this beast of a team, not a winnable game you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Gipetto said:

Considering the last QB drafted in the top 10 to start and win a Super Bowl was Peyton manning. I want a win every Sunday because none of these kids coming out of college are a guarantee.

SMH. Jared Goff was in a SB, Cam Newton in a SB, and Mahomes was the 12th pick. This argument is absolutely moronic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

yeah it's the nfl, bad teams are capable of squeaking out close one score victories against good teams

not sure what point you think you're making here

 

btw this is the same team that lost to the fugging lions (lulz), the cardinals and the giants... twice. better go ahead and chalk up an automatic loss i guess right? can't possibly beat this beast of a team, not a winnable game you think?

I am just saying that calling them a trash team and dismissing them is pretty laughable. After all.....we are a trash team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am just saying that calling them a trash team and dismissing them is pretty laughable. After all.....we are a trash team. 

not sure where you got that i was "dismissing them" only pointing out that it's definitely a winnable game. people are almost chalking up these last 4 games as automatic losses, but while the panthers are fugging bad, so is washington, so we'll see what happens.

it's completely possible that the panthers win 3 out of the last 4 games and finish 7-9. not what the "tank for higher pick" guys want to hear but definitely possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

not sure where you got that i was "dismissing them" only pointing out that it's definitely a winnable game. people are almost chalking up these last 4 games as automatic losses, but while the panthers are fugging bad, so is washington, so we'll see what happens.

it's completely possible that the panthers win 3 out of the last 4 games and finish 7-9. not what the "tank for higher pick" guys want to hear but definitely possible.

It’s definitely possible the Panthers finish 7-9. And I would hate that. Another mediocre finish to what should have been a garbage season and drafting a new QB at the top of the draft turns into drafting some random LB that Hurney will pay $100m in 2025

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

every team in the nfl has pockets of talents, even the garbage ones

 

but bruh they're 5-7 while playing in the worst division in football and haven't won a playoff game since 2005. they're fugging garbage, granted the panthers are too, but it's at the very least a winnable game

What is our "pocket of talent"?

 

And calling one of the best defenses in football "a pocket" is pretty comical.  They have been playing 10x better once Smith took over.  They are far from trash.  They are actually improving while we are sliding. 

 

If we dont win this weekend I doubt there is another W on the schedule for us.  I think it goes south pretty quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...