Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2021 Senior Bowl


Untouchable
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 1/20/2021 at 10:38 AM, stbugs said:

Didn’t see this earlier. That’s why Norwell went undrafted and we snagged him. Drills were also why lots of us hated Little after the combine. Maybe you can work with that OL but looking bad in drills should make you a much lower round pick/project (Norwell worked out) not someone for whom you trade first round pick value.

My sons and I got Norwell’s autograph in training camp after the SB. I got him over with an “Andrew” call. Seemed stunned that someone would call him by his first name or even knew his first name. I was pretty good at getting them to come over. Greg didn’t, but smiled and waived when I said we enjoyed seeing him at the local pizza place. It was his Friday night home game tradition and he was pretty much left alone. Got TD over telling him his son beat my youngest, who was there, in the flag football championship (true) and he signed his ball and told him to play better next time. Saw him a bunch at basketball. My son made 4 of 5 free throws to ice a game (he was 8 ) right after TD walked into the gym. He was so excited and asked if TD saw him and I was like yeah of course it was the only game and there wasn’t much else going on while you shot the free throws.

Cool story.  My son played HS basketball with David Thompson's son.  Thompson came to one game, and sat near me.  My son scored about 20 points in the second half and had about 14 boards--Thompson's son was terrible that night, but he did not seem to care.  They barely won the game, when my son hit a 25 foot 3 pointer at the buzzer.  Thompson grabbed me behind my neck and shook my head around a bit---he was excited.  When I told my son, he had to Google David Thompson.  He knew that his teammates' dad was a former college and pro player, but nothing else. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/17/2021 at 11:55 AM, stbugs said:

A G would be nice too. If we extend Moton we need 1 T and 3 IOL. It would be good if we don’t have LT blindness like Marty did and our interior still sucks. I’d honestly rather go QB, C/G, C/G knowing we are far more likely to solidify the interior and use the 2022 1st on a T if that may be a better class for 1st rounders. I don’t want to reach on a maybe T if there’s a sure thing G. Our best OL recently had Oher at LT and the 2017 OL was decent as well with speed bump because the IOL was solid. Easier to help out a tackle  when the interior is solid and we have a split RT 

Could play Humphrey at G until Paradis is no longer with us. I think if we did not draft a QB at 8 and went:

R1: Slater/Sewell

R2: Humphrey/Davis

R3: Trade for Darnold or draft Newman

We could roll out a Moton-Humphrey-Paradis-Miller-Slater OL and give whoever our QB is a healthy, young and strong OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

 

Thats nice 

But this is honestly like when Drew Lock had the best arm out of the 2019 group that included Daniel Jones, Will Grier, and Ryan Finley.

 

Newman is a Good Project, not aure id want to bank my hopes on him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

newton_david.png&w=160&h=160&scale=crop

David NewtonESPN Staff Writer 

New Panthers quarterbacks coach Sean Ryan seems to be taking at least some of the responsibility of OC coordinator Joe Brady, who is not attending the Senior Bowl due to COVID-related issue. Ryan previously has coached Matt Stafford and Deshaun Watson, both of who should be on Carolina's radar. Alabama's Mac Jones likely is the only QB here on the team's radar.

9591b9ee-fea8-4d1f-a5a5-6f4f3cd65f1d.png
  •  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...