Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eagles hire Nick Sirianni as HC


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2926699-nick-sirianni-reportedly-hired-as-eagles-new-hc-after-stint-as-colts-oc

Looks like Joe Brady ain't going anywhere this year. Maybe next year...

I don't believe there are any spots left open except the Texans. 

Maybe we can include him in our trade package...(◠‿◕)

 

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

If I were them, especially Bienemy, I wouldn't touch that job with a 10 foot pole! 

I probably wouldn't either, but how often do you get an opportunity to be an NFL head coach?

Watson wants him and Mahomes recommended him, so I definitely understand if the Texans hire him.

What I guess they have to hope at this point is that Nick Caserio can turn things around. And I'm pretty sure Caserio didn't want his first newsworthy action as GM to be losing DeShaun Watson.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

31 minutes ago, top dawg said:

If I were them, especially Bienemy, I wouldn't touch that job with a 10 foot pole! 

He’s got all the leverage though.

They need him to make DW happy.

He could command a Rhule type contract easily.

Edited by Tbe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Sirianni hire makes it VERY unlikely they go QB in the first.  They clearly want someone to fix Carson.  I can't blame them, they are already in a terrible cap spot and Carson's contract is an albatross.

They made it clear to every candidate they interviewed that the plan was to stick with Carson Wentz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty much.

I normally wouldn't be in favor of something like that, but given that they stupidly promised him to be part of the process and then didn't follow through with it, they need to do something.

They don't NEED to, but they clearly are.

You'd get a king's ransom for Watson. You'd have to blow up the team and start again, but Watt is coming to the end of his contract anyway so why not?

Especially as a new GM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

They don't NEED to, but they clearly are.

You'd get a king's ransom for Watson. You'd have to blow up the team and start again, but Watt is coming to the end of his contract anyway so why not?

Especially as a new GM. 

There might be other options if they had an owner that had any sense.

Of course, if they had an owner that had any sense, they probably wouldn't be where they are now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...