Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tampa at home for SB


Recommended Posts

Just now, KillerKat said:

wonder if that means they can use their own lockers or have to move to the visitor side loll

They’ll prob use some loophole that allows them to change the designation of their locker rooms...so the home officially becomes the visitors and Vice versus lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Yeah but I'd take going to a SB with a team of mercenaries over a team of "home grown talent" that loses every year like the Panthers

And if they wind up losing and sucking for the next decade when Brady retires? fug that I'd much rather build a team that can have sustained success than just go all in and hope it works out for a season or two. Even if they do win this year, once Brady's gone that team is gonna go right back to being completely miserable. I'd much rather be a Panthers fan going forward than a Bucs fan, despite their success this season.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

It got them their first SB if it gets them a second what Panthers fan here wouldn't make the same deal?

I wouldn't. I'd much rather try to build something like the Steelers, Pats, Chiefs now, Seahawks, Packers, etc. Consistent, sustained success with championship(s) mixed in too. Bucs have no shot at that, they might win 1 but then it's back to the dumpster for another decade. They have no direction at all once Brady and their key free agents are gone in the next year or two. And if they don't win this year or next that's even worse.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, t96 said:

And if they wind up losing and sucking for the next decade when Brady retires? fug that I'd much rather build a team that can have sustained success than just go all in and hope it works out for a season or two. Even if they do win this year, once Brady's gone that team is gonna go right back to being completely miserable. I'd much rather be a Panthers fan going forward than a Bucs fan, despite their success this season.

So if you were the Bucs would you have stayed with Jameis instead of signing Brady?

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, t96 said:

I wouldn't. I'd much rather try to build something like the Steelers, Pats, Chiefs now, Seahawks, Packers, etc. Consistent, sustained success with championship(s) mixed in too. Bucs have no shot at that, they might win 1 but then it's back to the dumpster for another decade. They have no direction at all once Brady and their key free agents are gone in the next year or two. And if they don't win this year or next that's even worse.

Only the Patriots have more than two titles.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...