Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers to be 'aggressive' in pursuit of potential Deshaun Watson trade


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

If anyone has to go it would and should be Burns. We can generate a pass rush by committee and bring in specialists. Can’t replace the best RB in the league and the best safety we’ve had in years.

If we land him the defense regresses further that's a given IMO.... Getting an oline to utilize all those weapons... how?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

If we land him the defense regresses further that's a given IMO.... Getting an oline to utilize all those weapons... how?

I don’t know how these things are certain.   Guys like Brown? Chinn? Will just get better.      Shouldn’t be hard for us to improve at LB over what we had last year IMO.   We still will have draft picks, players improving and rentals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

He's been spot on many things in the past, insider source, including but not limited to Irvin to the Seahawks at 16 when general consensus was that he was a low 2nd high third prospect.

 

*Little is trash*

Yeah that’s what I told him and he kept saying oh no he will go in first round and be really good. I told him he would be wrong on both so yeah I really don’t think he knows. If y’all want to believe some nobody that’s fine.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

He's been spot on many things in the past, insurer source, including but not limited to Irvin to the Seahawks at 16 when general consensus was that he was a low 2nd high third prospect.

Didn’t you know that if you don’t hit on 100% of your info, you’re a fraud? 

Little was a scouting error that many pros do more often than not. But apparently we have many here that just never got the chance to showcase their scouting chops.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Yeah that’s what I told him and he kept saying oh no he will go in first round and be really good. I told him he would be wrong on both so yeah I really don’t think he knows. If y’all want to believe some nobody that’s fine.

I remember, the Panthers didn't expect Burns to drop to them, In his infinite wisdom we all know Hurndog would have taken Little in round one and prove Verge right.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Deangelo where he should be. No Fasty. Obviously no pesce. Looks like we’re going back to Andersen. 
    • This is a two-part quiz that takes 5 minutes to take--if you need modification, they are available. Once you submit the answers to the first 2 questions (3 total answers) you take the USA Today online NFL Draft Quiz.  Complete the template below in your response.  Later tonight (after 8 pm), I will share the answers to the first two questions--please do not share your results until after 8 PM.  Obviously, if you choose not to participate, just don't participate and leave the replies for those who want to do this. (Honor system--Googling is CHEATING) 1.  Franchises with the most #1 picks in NFL History (2 are correct), so this counts as 2 points, 1 for each correct answer:  a) Bucs b) Jets c) Colts d) Rams e) Oilers/Titans 2.  How many #1 overall picks for the teams above were the most in NFL history? a) 3 b) 5 c) 6 d) 7 e) 9 OK for the next 10 questions, go to the link and take the 10 question online quiz.  Report your answers for the 2 questions above and the number correct from your online quiz. https://draftwire.usatoday.com/2021/11/01/nfl-draft-history-trivia-quiz/ SCALE:  12-13 correct:   Draft Royalty - you probably cheated though. 10-11  correct:  Stud.  Your brain is full of useless information. 8-9  correct:  Mr. or Mrs. Mediocre, which has probably been your goal for some time. 6-7  correct:  Snorkeler:  You can't quite reach the surface of the NFL knowledge pool, but you are close. 4-5  correct:  Life Support Recipient.  The people around you are Huddlers voting when to pull the plug.  0-3 correct:  Blue Tent Dweller.  You scored below random chance, meaning a toddler or monkey could have done better.  Stay in the blue tent.  The team is doing well without your input.   There is a non-monetary reward and consequence for being the top and low score.  All in fun.
    • Martin is not skating, replaced by Iskhakov. Fasching back in Holmstrom out. 
×
×
  • Create New...