Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else in dogecoin


Beerfacedlegend
 Share

Recommended Posts

One problem with Eth is the high "gas" fee for transactions, making it fairly impractical for day-to-day living. https://www.yahoo.com/video/ethereum-going-solve-fee-problem-110046619.html

Stolen from the Reddit, why cryptocurrency transactions are currently problematic for the average user:

Buy this coin, to move that coin from this wallet to your other wallet but you need to do it on this platform but make sure you buy some of these coins to get a discount but they’ll get burned with your transaction and make sure you’re sending on the right blockchain and the address is correct, check the first and last few digits and maybe do it thru a text editor so you don’t screw anything up, then you gotta pay this fee but it’s in this other coin. Ok you’re good to go. Oh btw, there’s no guarantee or insurance against you losing your money forever so you sit there biting your nails for 30 minutes to 2 days because you chose a slower transaction to cut on costs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 6 months later...
2 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

You cashed out?

Eth back in maybe 2015. Was going to hold but lost a good chunk in stock market and pulled to cover.  Trx cashed out a few months ago. Could have made life changing money in 2017 but didn't sell 😕

 

Still have btt,  wink, and nft. I'll check on those in about 20 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...