Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurricanes at Blue Jackets Predictions, Chatter, Series Thread 2/7-2/8


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'll take the W. Another ugly one but 2 points is 2 points. Still have no idea what the league/refs were thinking on wiping out 40 seconds of our PP. They got the call wrong initially, that sucked for the BJs but league needed to just live with their mistake, not make it worse and compound it by making some random call to wipe out a PP which can't be written into the rules as something that's allowed. I don't even care about the 40 seconds of PP time, more just flabbergasted by that decision. Hope for a better game from the boys tonight.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, t96 said:

I'll take the W. Another ugly one but 2 points is 2 points. Still have no idea what the league/refs were thinking on wiping out 40 seconds of our PP. They got the call wrong initially, that sucked for the BJs but league needed to just live with their mistake, not make it worse and compound it by making some random call to wipe out a PP which can't be written into the rules as something that's allowed. I don't even care about the 40 seconds of PP time, more just flabbergasted by that decision. Hope for a better game from the boys tonight.

The real question here is what was the league thinking allowing the goal. It was clearly offsides. 

I have no issue pulling the remaining time on the PP. Columbus got screwed once, screwing them twice would have been a bit much.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, trueblue said:

The real question here is what was the league thinking allowing the goal. It was clearly offsides. 

I have no issue pulling the remaining time on the PP. Columbus got screwed once, screwing them twice would have been a bit much.  

They claimed they didn’t have all the angles on the first review during intermission they got another angle that led to them changing their mind. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...