Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

La Canfora on Tepper's desire for Watson/franchise QB


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I see this as a way more reasonable take than the folks who are willing to just basically hand over a blank check.

Yeah, we can't just give the entire future away WITH a shitload of first rounders. Our core players are extremely valuable because we have so very few of them. Guys like Burns, Moore, Chinn and perhaps Moton, Brown, YGM, CMC, etc.....those guys are the future of this team. We don't have many on our roster that will likely be here in even three years(and some of those on that list may not either). You have to keep those kind of players around or you are doomed to be in a perpetual rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Not even close.

You said owners "all fold in these situations."  That's not true.

It is true! Show me one former player who ended up playing out his contract, much less a QB. They ALWAYS end up somewhere else after a season at most! The sit-out is part of the process. You should know that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:
4 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I think it was Schefter who reported that Watson said he grew up poor, he has managed his money well and can live off of little. He would be prepared to sit out. 

He has enough money to live comfortably for the remainder of his life. As long as he doesn't do foolish things with it or take unwarranted risks investing it, he shouldn't have to work another day if he so chooses. 

All true.

His gross contractual pay so far has been almost $41 million...the net-take obviously significantly lower after paying the agent, taxes, etc...

...next 5-years are worth $146,540,000.00 cold hard cash.

That's a lot of money to walk away from because your feelings got hurt -- I don't think he would ever do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Not even close.

You said owners "all fold in these situations."  That's not true.

How about you paint the scenario of their owner eating $35-42 mil in dead cap for 5 years over some sense of "pride?"

He will fold, or he wasn't a very smart businessman, he was just very lucky. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

By your standards he is -- by NFL QB standards, not at all.

McNair clearly doesn't care.

I don't believe so, but it is possible. 

As it relates to "the NBA mentality" this case with Watson is of landmark status --- I suspect other owners are counseling McNair to not allow precedent to be set here.

well, by NFL standards, Watson is rich

by NFL QB standards Watson is rich

he isn't long term NFL QB rich yet

he isn't superstar QB rich yet

 

and yeah, the Houston FO definitely cares about the shitshow they have found themselves in and about getting out of it the best way possible.  Whick IMO isn't clear.   

and I do agree Watson would be a landmark case.  It would be the NBA arriving.   But as I said, it is only a matter of time.   It is coming.  If it ain't Watson it will be someone soon enough.  And I agree most ownership hopes Hou sits Watson and beats him.   Well, except for the team that thinks they can land him and win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

How about you paint the scenario of their owner eating $35-42 mil in dead cap for 5 years over some sense of "pride?"

He will fold, or he wasn't a very smart businessman, he was just very lucky. 

If a player refuses to play, and isn't getting paid...what are the salary cap rules?

I don't know.

The current McNair inherited his money, nobody said he was smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not necessarily in favor of his contract (and given who wrote it that shouldn't be a surprise) but anytime I see someoneone talking about him like he's just a runningback, I make a mental note that this person doesn't know football.

Even the best RB in the NFL is still just a running back. Ladainian Tomlinson was the same sort of RB that CMC is. He also retired without any Super Bowl trophies. Marshall Faulk didn't have any titles until Kurt Warner showed up. That I am talking about eras in which RB's mattered a great deal more. 

Take a look at the last 15 leading rushers on the Super Bowl champions and the cost will stick out like a sore thumb. The fact of the matter is, it is a losing strategy to have a running back as one of your highest paid players. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

All true.

His gross contractual pay so far has been almost $41 million...the net-take obviously significantly lower after paying the agent, taxes, etc...

...next 5-years are worth $146,540,000.00 cold hard cash.

That's a lot of money to walk away from because your feelings got hurt -- I don't think he would ever do so.

Blah blah blah. Watson is going to end up somewhere else, and he's going to get paid whether you like it or not! $24 mil is not poor by the longest of longshots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going solely off of the talk about (3) 1st and CMC, here are two scenarios

1 - trade for Pick 3, draft Fields who is at best a 50/50 shot at becoming above average in the NFL.

Pick 8

Pick 40

2022 1st

That is 3 picks total. 

2 - trade for Watson, who is already a proven top 5 QB in the league, a true franchise changing QB

Pick 8

2022 1st

2023 1st

CMC

That is also 3 picks total and CMC.

 

Pick 8 and the 2022 1st cancel each other out. The difference becomes:

Pick 40 this year for a 50/50 rookie

Versus

2023 1st, CMC for proven top 5 QB

To me pick 40 to get a LT this year is more important than that 2023 1st. 

To me it is worth trading CMC to get the proven star.

If our GM cannot continue to build with picks in rounds 2-7 and free agency, then we hired the wrong guy.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

They'd be completely insane to not take that deal. A move down to 8, another first and an elite pass rusher on a rookie deal for the #2 overall pick? Yeah, you are really overvaluing that pick by a massive margin. 

I am not saying Houston wouldn't turn down my hypothetical Burns offer but any deal involving Burns is going to have to knock that starting price down. A LOT. I have no issues making a trade but there is no reason to trade a player of his caliber away and then give them a boatload of draft picks that absolutely remove any and all ability we would have to replace him. 


Everyone is forgetting that other teams can make offers also.  It isn’t as simple as making a good offer, you have to make a better offer than the other teams.

Two 1st and Burns from us or Three 1st from the Jets? 

They probably take the Jets offer so the can grab QB2.  They would probably take just 2 first from  the Jets over our offer. Don’t underestimate the allure of being a ole to draft a potential franchise QB.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

If a player refuses to play, and isn't getting paid...what are the salary cap rules?

I don't know.

The current McNair inherited his money, nobody said he was smart.

The money still counts against the cap. They can avoid actually making any payments to him but they don't get to spend that money. Once the season starts, if he is on the roster, his salary counts against the cap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MVPccaffrey said:

If Tepper makes this happen he'll have done more good for the franchise in two years than the Leg Shaver did in twenty five

Hey!  That’s “Mister” Leg Shaver.  
 

But yeah, as much as I would love Deshaun, I don’t see it happening without giving up the farm.  They already have David Johnson (even though CMC is clearly better), so I feel like we’d have to throw in defensive players as well.  Brian Burns is the main one I’m concerned about.  I think he’ll keep improving into one of the best.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Blah blah blah. Watson is going to end up somewhere else, and he's going to get paid whether you like it or not! $24 mil is not poor by the longest of longshots.

8 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

LeVeon Bell.

 

The Steelers ultimately let him walk without tagging him, evrn though they had the option of doing so.

Also, apples to oranges!

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I found an article that does a good job of explaining the position.  The position, in terms of athleticism and physicality, is less demanding than G or T.  So stepping into that role from G or T should not be a physical challenge, in general. However, a C must know how to snap 2 ways (it is not that difficult, to be honest) and must read defenses and call schemes.  They are the vocal leader of the OL--so maybe Corbett and BC have always been  out of position.  When Bryce talked about Corbett talking a lot and asking questions during film sessions when he was injured, this is what he meant.  I will bold the parts of this that apply to Corbett in a positive way.  It seems to me that the mental or cerebral challenges are the most important skill a center needs--if a person has played G, they (physically) will not be asked to do more--they will actually be asked to do less--physically.  Mentally and vocally, however, they must be leaders, quick decision makers, and students of the game---QUARTERBACKS, in other words.   Frankly, after reading this, I see why they feel confident in Austin Corbett and Brady Christensen at Center.  Both should be better players there.  The Center Position in Football: An In-Depth Guide Posted by Throw Deep Publishing Staff on June 23, 2022 Centers are both the underdog of their offensive line counterparts – and the brains behind the entire operation of the offensive line unit. Centers often find their way to the position being a little less naturally gifted than the guards and tackles positioned to their left and right. Usually a bit undersized, or a step slower, centers make up for this with a combination of high football IQ and gritty style of play that allows them to be the leader up front for the offense. Coaches talk a lot about their great players being extensions of coaches on the field, and centers have to be exactly that. The offensive line’s duty is much less fixated than that of skill players such as the running backs and wide receivers. They have calls in place, but ones that vary completely on the look that the defense shows on each and every play, whether it is a run or pass play. This is where the center comes in – as it falls on him to be the lead communicator and direct traffic for each and every play. The physical demands of the center position are plenty to speak of as well in their own right. Snapping the football, executing blocks in the trenches, and working up to linebackers are all part of the gig for the center position. Below will uncover even further the detailed demands of the position, and the crucial role the position plays in the success of an offense. What does a Center do in Football? As the team gets up to the line of scrimmage, it is the job of the center to direct his offensive line counterparts in the right direction to execute the play. He must be prepared to call out pass protections, identify the middle linebacker, and ensure the OL is on track in the run game to block the correct defenders. He has no choice but to be an extremely vocal leader, taking responsibility to put the offense in successful spots. As offenses go faster and faster in today’s game of football, the center must be a quick decision maker, which comes with intense film work, and deep studies of opposing defenses heading into each game. All of this shows the high-level parts of the job the center possesses before the play even begins. Moving to the physical elements of the job, the center is tasked with snapping the ball every play, getting the ball safely back to the quarterback, and immediately being prepared to go toe to toe against heavy interior defensive lineman. Whether it’s working a combination block up to linebacker level, occasionally pulling as a lead blocker, or picking up blitzes in pass protection, the center must be both athletic and strong enough to battle all game long against opposing defenses.     What are some other names for the Center Position? There aren't a lot of other popular nicknames for the center position in football, but they are sometimes referred to as the quarterbacks of the offensive line, since they have to make a lot of calls and "direct traffic" so to speak with the other four men at the line of scrimmage. What are the Skills and Body Type needed to play the Center in Football? Skills Football IQ  (Both Christensen and Corbett seem to be very smart--Corbett seems to be a student of the game) Leadership  (Based on Young's comments, Corbett is a leader in the film room and that will transfer to the field) Agility  (Guards require more agility than centers) Strength (lower body strength is key here, but both have shorter arms--arm length is less of an issue for Centers than T or G) Run-Blocking (Guards are usually better run blockers than centers--it is where they make their money--so I do not expect either to be a liability as a run blocker) Pass-Blocking  (Although shorter and more compact, Corbett has the longer arms--33 1/8" vs. Christensen's 32 1/4"--physically, Corbett is best suited to play center considering his physical make up--see below) Shotgun and Under-Center Snapping:  (This can be problematic if the mental aspects overshadow the perfunctory execution of tasks, but snapping is something that takes reps.  It may involve different hand padding/tape/gloves than usual, but nobody is physically unable to snap a ball to the QB standing five yards behind.  Few can get open, throw a 50-yard dime, or kick a field goal--but everyone can snap a football.  The issue is, of course, perfecting the timing, accuracy, etc. That can be done with reps.  I have no doubt that Corbett and Christensen have been doing it for months now.) Not all offensive lineman can be a center due to the mental demands of the position. Centers possess high-level football knowledge and leadership within the offensive line unit. Body Type (General Estimate) Height: 6’1-6’4 Weight: 310-325 Pounds Build: Thick, Compact Centers tend to be a bit undersized and less athletic compared to the offensive line. They often make up for this with more of a compact build combined with toughness and physicality. MHS Epiphany: A good example:  Ryan Kalil.  When we drafted him, we tried him (during his rookie year) at guard.  He sucked.  the reason?  If you ever talked to Kalil, you would realize that he is very intelligent.  Sarcastic, but intelligent.  He was not that big (maybe 285 to 290 when he played) and not tall (listed at 6'2" but he was 6'0"--maybe 6'1".  He struggled at guard because, physically, he was inferior.  At center, however, he could use his brain and leadership skills, so he became an all pro there.  He was a center--full stop.  Better athletes owned him as a guard, but as a Center, he was superior because he directed traffic effectively. I hope this makes people understand the decision the Panthers made.  It makes theoretical sense, when you think about it.  Based on interviews and insights, I think Corbett and Christensen are smart--I hope that translates to football smarts.  Not sure about Mays.  Pretty sure Zavala does not have it.  I bet Bozeman did not have it.
    • Scott Fitterer would have turned this trade down 😂
    • Here's the clip. I don't see the issue everyone seems to be worried about. He's been working this position for several years and now he'll prove it. https://youtu.be/tuul7aBtbGA?si=k-gyD4adheHnnMXu
×
×
  • Create New...