Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Suppose CMC is part of the deal for Watson


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

He isn't some unicorn player. He is the same thing Ladainian Tomlinson, Marshall Faulk or any of these other high caliber dual threat feature backs were. That doesn't change that he is a HOF talent, however.

The thing that you are failing to see is that RB's don't win games based on being great, especially in the modern NFL. It isn't a requirement to have an elite or HOF caliber RB to win a Super Bowl. The post you are responding to is absolutely correct. There is a reason why most of these recent Super Bowl champions don't have large sums of money tied up at RB. What you do largely see in those teams is them having elite or HOF caliber QB's in the overwhelming majority of those games. That isn't an accident.

"He not special, just another hall of fame dual threat RB" is a nonsensical take IMO. I also think he's a more natural receiver than either and could play it full time if he had to, but that's beside the point.

I'm not arguing about the value of the RB position in the modern NFL. I take issue with everyone acting like it was another crazy overspend on Hurney's part. You can argue about whether it's justified on the field but the market is what it is. He locked in the top RB in the league for just a little more than the going rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

That isn't true either. He didn't compare that well to true slot or wide receivers largely due to limited opportunities. The majority of the time his passes were behind the line of scrimmage and there he dominated. He had done whatever asked  and had still been used as a primary RB. That doesn't mean he isnt good in the slot given how elusive he is in open space. He hasn't really played much in this system. Let's see how 2021 goes.

I mean, you can gyrate all you want but the stats were what they were. 

The "he can be a slot WR" crowd is truly perplexing. If he can transition to being a slot WR(which he most likely cannot), how does that make him more valuable? I can get a much more effective slot WR for far less money. Frankly, if I have $16 mil/year average to replace him with a RB and a slot WR over the next five years, I can definitely get his level of production from two players for less money.

He's being paid for the thing that he does...which is being an elite RB. Same reason Kamara got a pile of money(also another guy that could easily generate 1000/1000 seasons if he ever had the workload CMC does). Same reason Dalvin Cook got a pile of money. 

The argument against paying CMC has never, EVER been about who he is as a player. It's about what RB is as a position and it's relative value in the modern NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

"He not special, just another hall of fame dual threat RB" is a nonsensical take IMO. I also think he's a more natural receiver than either and could play it full time if he had to, but that's beside the point.

I'm not arguing about the value of the RB position in the modern NFL. I take issue with everyone acting like it was another crazy overspend on Hurney's part. You can argue about whether it's justified on the field but the market is what it is. He locked in the top RB in the league for just a little more than the going rate.

He had 2 years left on his deal.  It was incredibly stupid and unnecessary to extend him when they did

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Right 🙄

Here's the thing. Any time he wants to, Bill Voth can walk up to Samir Suleiman and say "Hey man, what would happen to the cap if we traded / cut this player?"

I can pretty much guarantee that Suleiman's answer is not going to be "Let me go look that up on the internet."

Feel free to write a hundred more paragraphs trying to explain how your opinion as a guy who looks up stuff on the internet is more informed than that of someone who's actually part of the organization. Just be advised ahead of time that you've already lost my interest.

Lmao I’m sure Voth can walk right up to Samir and ask him that. Voth is just a reporter he isn’t in their building. You crack me up man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

It’s pretty simple math.  Nobody is saying it wouldn't be expensive, I’m just saying it’s feasible.

Actually I don't think Voth said it was impossible you are just interpreting it that way. 
 

 

Yeah that’s what Mr. Scot always does gives everyone the Debbie downer response. Best not to talk to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MechaZain said:

"He not special, just another hall of fame dual threat RB" is a nonsensical take IMO. I also think he's a more natural receiver than either and could play it full time if he had to, but that's beside the point.

I'm not arguing about the value of the RB position in the modern NFL. I take issue with everyone acting like it was another crazy overspend on Hurney's part. You can argue about whether it's justified on the field but the market is what it is. He locked in the top RB in the league for just a little more than the going rate.

It isn't a nonsensical take. The list of HOF RB's with Super Bowl rings isn't large in the past 25 years. I think it includes 5-6 players.

It was a crazy overspend. The market was SET by us, that is a classic Hurney move. The other big recent deals came AFTER the CMC contract. I'm not saying CMC isn't worth $16 mil, I'm saying NO NFL RB is currently worth that. Ask all those teams that have been paying top 5 RB money over the past 5-7 years. 

It's not what smart, winning franchises do. It isn't a coincidence that we haven't been a smart nor winning franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He had 2 years left on his deal.  It was incredibly stupid and unnecessary to extend him when they did

Easy to say with hindsight. He was looking inhumanely durable at the time and if that continued we would have had to pay more or someone else would have at the end of his rookie deal.

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It isn't a nonsensical take. The list of HOF RB's with Super Bowl rings isn't large in the past 25 years. I think it includes 5-6 players.

It was a crazy overspend. The market was SET by us, that is a classic Hurney move. The other big recent deals came AFTER the CMC contract. I'm not saying CMC isn't worth $16 mil, I'm saying NO NFL RB is currently worth that. Ask all those teams that have been paying top 5 RB money over the past 5-7 years. 

It's not what smart, winning franchises do. It isn't a coincidence that we haven't been a smart nor winning franchise.

Dallas set the market with Zeke months before CMC's deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Easy to say with hindsight. He was looking inhumanely durable at the time and if that continued we would have had to pay more or someone else would have at the end of his rookie deal.

Dallas set the market with Zeke months before CMC's deal.

The market is fluid but we were the team that "set" the current market, as Kamara and Cook's deals followed in the next few months. I don't expect we will see a new highwater mark for a bit after the cap drop. Drake and Aaron Jones are the only real threats this offseason and I don't see record deals being signed in either case. Then you have Chubb, Barkley and Ronald Jones in 2022. It's possible it happens that year but I wouldn't make a substantial bet on it. 

You never know, we aren't the only extremely stupid front office in the NFL, that is for certain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Easy to say with hindsight. He was looking inhumanely durable at the time and if that continued we would have had to pay more or someone else would have at the end of his rookie deal.

Dallas set the market with Zeke months before CMC's deal.

There is no hindsight.  He had 2 years left on his rookie deal.  It was unnecessary. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The market is fluid but we were the team that "set" the current market, as Kamara and Cook's deals followed in the next few months. I don't expect we will see a new highwater mark for a bit after the cap drop. Drake and Aaron Jones are the only real threats this offseason and I don't see record deals being signed in either case. Then you have Chubb, Barkley and Ronald Jones in 2022. It's possible it happens that year but I wouldn't make a substantial bet on it. 

You never know, we aren't the only extremely stupid front office in the NFL, that is for certain. 

The market was $15m/yr for the top RB in the league at the time. Hurney had a guy that was even better, and managed to only pay an extra $1m/yr more for him. That's good negotiation on both parts.

I totally get you. The debate over whether the position is overvalued in general is completely valid, but relative to his peers it was good deal and arguably a bargain on Hurney's part. 

Edited by MechaZain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, you can gyrate all you want but the stats were what they were. 

The "he can be a slot WR" crowd is truly perplexing. If he can transition to being a slot WR(which he most likely cannot), how does that make him more valuable? I can get a much more effective slot WR for far less money. Frankly, if I have $16 mil/year average to replace him with a RB and a slot WR over the next five years, I can definitely get his level of production from two players for less money.

He's being paid for the thing that he does...which is being an elite RB. Same reason Kamara got a pile of money(also another guy that could easily generate 1000/1000 seasons if he ever had the workload CMC does). Same reason Dalvin Cook got a pile of money. 

The argument against paying CMC has never, EVER been about who he is as a player. It's about what RB is as a position and it's relative value in the modern NFL. 

That is the point with stats. They are numbers plain and simple. The analysis is key and what gives numbers context. And our system as it was run last year doesn't focus on the running back as simply a running back but someone who can block, run and catch passes which is why McCaffrey is so valuable.  It isn't looking simply at a position but how that position is used by that team thus defining the value of that player to that team. That is why as valuable as Davis was last year he was a partial replacement for CMC who can do everything Davis can do and much more. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BurnNChinn said:

Lmao I’m sure Voth can walk right up to Samir and ask him that. Voth is just a reporter he isn’t in their building. You crack me up man!

Wait... Do you genuinely not know that Bill Voth is employed by the Panthers?

I swear, we've reached a whole new level of dumb in this thread

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most Huddlers have contacted me via Twitter, Zoom conference, PM, email, and in one case, a telegram delivered by the Pony Express (Mr. Scot) and asked me, "MHS, what are we going to do about the OL?  We already have the highest payroll and we are about to either pay Ekwonu for a fifth year or a lucrative, long-term contract.  Is this sustainable?"  "Nope." So I done some thinking, I did. I looked at contracts (OTC) and performance (PFF--the best available rating system, albeit flawed--let's move on) and age of the players.   A source called "AI" (yes, TheSpecialJuan, the same people who make the steak sauce) says this: Peak performance by position   Tackles: Peak performance can last longer for tackles, with top-tier players often peaking around age 34.   Centers and Guards: Peak performance for centers and guards generally occurs earlier, with peak years often ending between 29 and 32 years old.  So with that in mind, I offer you something called "Research" (literally, it means "to look for it again.") Enjoy GUARD Robert Hunt.  He is 29 right now and under contract for another 3 seasons. However, paying a G in his 30s $24m per season is crazy.  Something has to give.  We get no cap help by cutting him after this season unless he is a Post June 1 cut, then we throw $15m on the dead cap and save $9m.  Not worth it.  However, after the 2026 season, the post-June 1 savings go up to $19m. It is $13m if he is cut pre-June 1.  Hunt will be 31 (not that old for a G), but we would be smart to use that $$ elsewhere.  I think we need to plan on having Hunt on this team through 2026, unless he restructures, something I do not think serves the best long-term interests of the Panthers. Damien Lewis.  (28) Less money, but nearly the same situation.  If he becomes a post-June 1 cut after the 2026 season, we would save $19m.  One could argue that both Lewis and Hunt could be on the roster through 2027, and a lot depends on the QB situation.  Still, if I am GM, I take a look at the current situation at Guard.  Lewis has 3-4 good years left and has been very solid.  With only half his contract guaranteed, it makes sense to extend Lewis and cut Hunt. Jake Curhan…If you have been paying attention, he has been solid. In the long-term plans, this could be a lot more significant than it seems right now. Over the past few weeks, T Jake Curhan has been solid at RG.  He is 27.  I lock him down with a 4-year deal in the $8m-10m per range and make him my backup in 2026 (at 28) and starter in 2027 (at 29).       Guard Prognosis: Sign Curhan to a long-term deal, based on his performance at RG.  Extend Lewis for 2 years, keeping him as the RG  through 2029.  Trade Hunt now or release him after the 2026 season. Zavala is under contract through 2026 on a very team-friendly deal. He was better in 2024, fwiw, but those 2025 numbers are terrible.  Not sure we need a G in 2026 draft, unless we trade Hunt. (good luck with that).   CENTER Cade Mays. (26) Mays is entering his prime as an OL and he has played several interior OL positions, making his contributions valuable.  He is probably average to slightly below average as a center, but he needs a contract.  An ideal IOL backup, he still has upside and is not a liability at center.  He needs to improve on his run blocking, but for a center, that has a lot to do with his abilities to recognize stunts and call blocking assignments–understandable.  Pass blocking is good, fwiw.  He needs a 4-year deal to keep him on the roster, and signing him now might be wise.  Nick Samac (24).  It is noteworthy that the Panthers pulled up center Nick Samac (24) from the Ravens’ practice squad, who the Ravens were fairly high on, so maybe center is not as big a need as we think. I still think we should draft or sign a C at some point with the mindset of moving Cade Mays to a reserve IOL.   Austin Corbett (30)  meanwhile, the oft-injured G converted to center, is making $10m this season and 2026 is a voidable year.  He is probably gone.  He is having a better year than Mays in spot duty, but last season, Mays actually outperformed Corbett using the PFF data.     Center Prognosis:  Sign Mays to a long-term, reasonable contract (backup rate with starting incentives), allow Samac to compete for the job/backup job (I have no idea how good he is).  Draft a center in 2026.  Say “bye-bye” to IR Corbett.   TACKLE Icky Ekwonu (25) will see his salary double to about $17m in 2026, but I expect him to be re-signed to a long-term deal through the 2030 season.  If I am Morgan and I am not extending Young, I make that deal front-loaded Taylor Moton (31) has been solid, and his salary for 2026 ($21m) means that he will be our RT next season.  He is likely to be in Carolina through 2027, when he turns 33, but the salary will be $28m, with half guaranteed.  He has a low, voidable year in 2028 (age 34) at a reasonable $6m.   Brady Christensen (29).  Listed as a G, he is (to me) the epitome of a swing OT with the ability to backup OG, lowering the need to draft a G. He needs a deal, however, and if I am the Panthers, I give him a 3-year deal because his depth is valuable and he is playing well. Yosh Nijman (29). Nope. A pass pro grade of 46.7 gets your QB blue tented.  His contract expires at the end of the 2025 season.  We need to draft Moton’s future replacement and possible backup.  Let BC play behind Icky and provide G depth.  Time to groom the next RT.   Tackle Prognosis:  Give Ickey the deal he deserves (ouch) and lock him down.  Count on Moton being your RT for 2026 and probably 2027.  Re-sign BC and let him play swing T and provide G depth.  Draft a RT in the 2026 draft.    OVERALL:  The OL needs to manage the cap to sustain future growth, so the priority needs to be re-signing Curhan and planning for the Hunt departure. Re-sign Brady Christensen and Cade Mays to contracts of 3 years or so. Extend Lewis.  Lock Ickey down. Draft or sign a RT and C. Let Corbett and Nijman walk.  Lewis needs to restructure and Hunt needs to be gone before 2027. We lose the $10m Corbett salary and Nijman’s $3m, but Ickey’s salary goes up about $10m (5th year–unless he is signed to a long-term deal that absorbs some of that cost).  Lewis should be extended to save some cap room in 2026, but that $$ would go to the BC and Mays contracts. Curhan needs a deal because we need a proven commodity to replace Hunt down the road.  So the cap might increase for the OL in 2026 a bit, facilitating the Hunt release in 2027, which saves nearly $20m.  Of course, locking down Ickey now could make the 2026 cap more manageable.  With liabilities Corbett and Nijman gone (and the $13m they were paid), we can re-sign BC and Mays.  Lewis’ restructure could cover the first year of the Ickey deal and maybe Curhan will not be too expensive to re-sign.  If we could do this, our OL depth would be better and our future would be cheaper and brighter.   Urgency for 2026:   Tackle:  Low if we re-sign BC and draft a RT to develop behind Moton.   Guard: Low if we still have Hunt, Lewis, Curhan, and Zavala for 2026. Center: Medium urgency in that Mays has been decent and is entering his prime.  What do we have behind him?  Competition and depth needed.  (NOTE:  I think the depth positions need to be filled in the draft because we can't afford free agents in 2026.)
    • Isaiah Simmons is absolutely horrible. His change of direction is poor, but the most disturbing part about him is how physically weak he is for his size. He can get stiff armed by WRs and knocked to the turf.  Simmons will play OLB for us due to his height which can help in pass coverage. Keep in mind that he's terrible. 
    • Has he fumbled on a carry or is it just returns?
×
×
  • Create New...