Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF FA & draft preview for Panthers


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

PFF gives some analysis as to what we need to concentrate on, and possible fixes regarding a free agent and a draft prospect.  They specifically mention the O-line, and the offense in general with Curt's probable departure and the bottom-barrel TE room. Moreover, they believe we have a pretty much gaping hole at safety and could stand another cover corner considering how much cover 3 we play. 

Read the article for the particulars, but here's some QB stuff, which in their opinion is rightly the largest priority, as well as a bit on CMC.

 

 

 

On any QB needy team, including us:

"Any quarterback-needy team in the top 10 of this year's draft should consider drafting one of the top prospects. The top three players on PFF’s Big Board — Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson and Justin Fields — are all quarterbacks. All three are talented enough to be worthy of No. 1 overall pick consideration in a typical draft. That doesn’t even include Trey Lance, who PFF lead draft analyst Mike Renner labels as having both the strongest arm and the best rushing ability of any quarterback in this class. There are legitimate reasons to consider Alabama’s Mac Jones in the first half of Round 1, as well."

 

On CMC;

"The argument that his absence made the Panthers’ offense better in 2020 seems disingenuous at first glance...

"The basis of the argument for the Panthers' offense operating more smoothly with Mike Davis starting is that the team had become so reliant on McCaffrey that it was forgoing more valuable looks down the field to pepper him with targets near the line of scrimmage. In his absence, wideouts Moore, Anderson and Samuel showed what they could do as featured elements of the passing game.

"...the Panthers also need to make a concerted effort to avoid running their offense so heavily through their All-Pro running back."

 

On Watson:

"...My advice to Carolina if a Watson trade is on the table is the same advice I would give almost every other team in the league in that scenario: take it. PFF has written at length over the past several months about Watson's prowess and where he projects moving forward. He’s a young, franchise-altering quarterback..."

 

Fields gets a nod:

"Bringing in a talented quarterback on a rookie deal has clear benefits, however. The Panthers would likely have to trade up for either Zach Wilson or Justin Fields, but both of those players are worth it. Fields, specifically, boasts arguably the best accuracy of any quarterback in the draft class to go along with high-level rushing ability..."

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-carolina-panthers-2021-free-agency-nfl-draft-preview

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Everybody keep ignoring Trey Lance. Please.

I wouldn't say that they ignored him. Dude said he had the best arm and rushing ability in this class. To me, that speaks volumes! It's just that smart people realize that he will likely need more time than the others to develop. And, I'd argue that he is the hardest to evaluate simply from lack of the number of games that he played due to this missed season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 54th man said:

Honestly I dont mind moving up to draft wilson or fields at 2 or 3 and moving to to 6 to draft lance IF all the other qbs are gone but no to mac jones unless it's a move down to get and that ain't happening 

Then we take Slater or Sewell at 8, and solve a different problem. Or see if anybody wants to move up a bit for a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...