Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trey Lance - best QB of this draft not named Lawrence

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Forget the odds- Who are you taking if Chase, Fields, and Sewell are at 8. Cannt trade back either, must make a choice.

Choose wisely..

Sewell because there is no point in having an elite QB and defense if the O-line can't protect the QB long enough to make a pass.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No one has a crystal ball. Sure, one of those guys could develop injury problems like Garappolo. Goff was always physically limited. It was baffling that he was a #1 overall pick. His arm is average at absolute best. Same with Foles. He has a good arm, but concrete boots for feet. All three of the draft prospects we're talking about as well as Watson have a lot better physical tools than Goff and Foles.

Watson has had 2 ACL tears, one for each leg. Wilson has had known elbow and shoulder injuries. Im legit scared about trading 3 1sts, 3 2nds, 4th, 5th, and good young defenders for either... I dont even want to trade that for lance and I drive the lanceusexual spaceship.. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Watson has had 2 ACL tears, one for each leg. Wilson has had known elbow and shoulder injuries. Im legit scared about trading 3 1sts, 3 2nds, 4th, 5th, and good young defenders for either... I dont even want to trade that for lance and I drive the lanceusexual spaceship.. 

it’s just a ton to give up for any single player. He’s a known elite player which is usually better than rookie unknowns but it’s A TON of compensation to give up. We might be better off just drafting a QB with our first and second round picks for the next three years and keep our young defenders. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Forget the odds- Who are you taking if Chase, Fields, and Sewell are at 8. Cannt trade back either, must make a choice.

Choose wisely..

Sewell is my top player of those left. If it were Fields vs Chase or Pitts I’d likely go Fields. Pitts or Chase would be a tough decision. It’s been so long since we’ve have great LT play it’s hard to pass up. The only player in this class id 100% draft over Sewell is Lawrence. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Varking said:

it’s just a ton to give up for any single player. He’s a known elite player which is usually better than rookie unknowns but it’s A TON of compensation to give up. We might be better off just drafting a QB with our first and second round picks for the next three years and keep our young defenders. 

We agree on this for sure, plus given QB contracts are 45+ million now........those rookie deals look even juicer now. Plus you can tag 3 years after a 5th year option.....thats still chicken feed compared to what would be 50 million per at that point. Seems no other QB besides Brady is willing to less, dont blame them one bit tho..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Varking said:

Sewell is my top player of those left. If it were Fields vs Chase or Pitts I’d likely go Fields. Pitts or Chase would be a tough decision. It’s been so long since we’ve have great LT play it’s hard to pass up. The only player in this class id 100% draft over Sewell is Lawrence. 

Choose GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pup McBarky Proficient

Pup McBarky

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

For everyone begging for Sewell while talking about the risks of the QB prospects, feel free to take a look at the loooooong list of 1st round OT busts in the last 15 years or so.

There's a chance he could bust...like anyone else. But from everything I've read, he's as solid a LT prospect as Lawrence is a QB prospect. In short, nobody really believes either of them will be busts. They may not live up to expectations, but nobody thinks they won't be solid starters at minimum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Pup McBarky said:

There's a chance he could bust...like anyone else. But from everything I've read, he's as solid a LT prospect as Lawrence is a QB prospect. In short, nobody really believes either of them will be busts. They may not live up to expectations, but nobody thinks they won't be solid starters at minimum. 

Nobody thought all those other highly drafted OTs were gonna bust either. Remember Robert Gallery? He was supposed to be the best OT prospect in a looking time. Some don't even think Sewell is the best in this class. Yeah, Sewell is a very good prospect but better have busted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

For everyone begging for Sewell while talking about the risks of the QB prospects, feel free to take a look at the loooooong list of 1st round OT busts in the last 15 years or so.

Why?!?!? I going to ignore everything that goes against my beliefs!!1!!11

Also if you look at the league and current history, its easier to find a top tier QB than top tier LT. I want to see Sewells pro day, but right now hes still solid #3 overall. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Remaining Schedule

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      So we have a pretty tough schedule for the remainder of the season.  I believe I saw where it's the toughest remaining schedule in the league.  To even think about the playoffs we IMO have to, at minimum, win three of the remaining six.  49ers - We will have to play an amazing game to win this one.  We are down to backups at LB (at least for now) and Kittle is probably going to have a big day.  CMC must not go off on us.  PFF had a pregame analysis and actually the two guys running the show were split on who wins.  They even said it was disrespectful to the Panthers to be 7pt underdog.  Evero is going to have to have a great gameplan.   I'm on the fence but this game is in SF and I think we lose. Rams - We're at home that is about the only advantage I see in this game.  LA is one of the best offenses in the league and I just don't think we have the firepower to beat them.  The only way we win is if we can control the clock and keep LA's offense off the field. Saints - We have to go into this game on a mission.  WE HAVE TO WIN THIS GAME.  Hopefully, Canales has a better gameplan and we win.  This is a very winnable game. TB x 2 - The only chance, IMO, of winning the NFCS is we have to win both games.  Many talking heads say TB is faltering some and can be had.  By week 15 and 17 we should be hitting on all cylinders.  If we win, it's going to have to be a pretty mistake free. Seahawks - they have a very tough defense, and I think we get shut down.  Our only hope is to pressure Darnold into mistakes like he did this past weekend with 4 INTs.  As with the Rams we are going to have to keep this a low scoring game. My hope is  49ers- Win Rams - Loss Saints - Win Bucs@Home - Win Seattle - Loss Bucs@TB - Loss 9-8 Record My Fear 49ers-Loss Rams-Loss Saints-Win Bucs@home - Loss Seahawks - Loss Bucs@TB - Loss 7-10 record
    • mrcompletely11
      ESPN’s Benjamin Solak on Panthers LT

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      With Motons deal (stupid), Hunt, Lewis and Mayes and Icky upcoming our line is going to be the most expensive again in the nfl.   Its going to be an interesting snap shot if this type of team building works. 
    • Bear Hands
      Hubbard says he might have rushed back

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      We have an easy out after this season with marginal dead cap. Could be smart given the situation and RB landscape.  This part isn’t at you—but in general: None of these guys are world beaters — sure they have been great for us at times but I just hope we don’t get this emotional investment paired with financials. I don’t think we need to teget all antsy about keeping Dowdle when he’ll be 28 next year. I don’t mind just continuously taking a stab in the late rounds every year on one.  We should not be investing in one guy in particular when they’re not really a game breaker. See: Sanders, Hubbard, etc.  I’d say heck yes, take a shot at a guy high up if you’re convinced you’ve landed a Gibbs or Taylor level, but otherwise, don’t invest, don’t get emotional about a 3-4 game stretch. Reset and see what type of committee you can construct with fresh legs.   
×
×
  • Create New...