Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?


Sasquatch
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, CRA said:

He literally just ran for public office last election cycle. 

He admitted to using created fake texts as the mayor of Houston was calling on him to be criminally prosecuted.  

I’ve continuously maintained either side could be telling the truth and people need to pump the breaks on judgement 

So what?  There's nothing wrong with running for Mayor. 

It was a political ad akin to "paid actors" simulating real life situations -- happens in all kinds of ads all-day every-day.  Mayor of Houston whined & bitched at length (kinda like DW) to no avail, there was no violation. 

Ye doth protest too much...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So what?  There's nothing wrong with running for Mayor. 

It was a political ad akin to "paid actors" simulating real life situations -- happens in all kinds of ads all-day every-day.  Mayor of Houston whined & bitched at length (kinda like DW) to no avail, there was no violation. 

Ye doth protest too much...

 

Says the guy that has already declared deshaun guilty. Spare me your "impartial observation" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Again I find it strange with such a big fish on the hook that all these victims pick the same lawyer and no other Lawyer wants the publicity and pay out of this case???

This is how class-action lawsuits work.  

Apparently Watson blew through a significant portion of the working massage therapists in Houston...

...makes perfect sense they'd end up with the same lawyer in the same town. 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

This is how class-action lawsuits work.  

Apparently Watson blew through a significant portion of the working massage therapists in Houston...

...makes perfect sense they'd end up with the same lawyer in the same town. 

No not really .. Some of these women were flown in and still in any Class action lawsuits other lawyers and law offices jump in.. 

1. Not all these Women had the same experience.. Who would want 1 lawyer to decide the pay out for each women pain and grief level .

2. At some point some of these victims are looking for their best interest not the interest of the group..

3. Since some of these women are out of state a better strategy is having Rusty face 10 or 12 different lawyers instead of 1...

4. A lot of class action law suits like Johnson and Johnson.. Seem like a really good chance for alot of different law firms attacking 1 entity at fault for wrong doing and getting a piece of the pay out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

No not really .. Some of these women were flown in and still in any Class action lawsuits other lawyers and law offices jump in.. 

1. Not all these Women had the same experience.. Who would want 1 lawyer to decide the pay out for each women pain and grief level .

2. At some point some of these victims are looking for their best interest not the interest of the group..

3. Since some of these women are out of state a better strategy is having Rusty face 10 or 12 different lawyers instead of 1...

4. A lot of class action law suits like Johnson and Johnson.. Seem like a really good chance for alot of different law firms attacking 1 entity at fault for wrong doing and getting a piece of the pay out. 

You have no idea of which you speak...

NOTE: In the previous post I meant to mention in terms of "numbers" this may not yet rise to the level of a "class action" suit but the general legal strategy is identical. 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

You have no idea of which you speak...

Show me a case where a law suit was brought by multiple plaintiffs and 1 lawyer??

 

Don't worry I'll wait...

The former president has been brought up on a few of these civil suits ... Those 13 women didn't use the same lawyer why?? If it's such a regular occurrence...

The women suing Weissman don't have the same lawyers..

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Show me a case where a law suit was brought by multiple plaintiffs and 1 lawyer??

 

Don't worry I'll wait...

The former president has been brought up on a few of these civil suits ... Those 13 women didn't use the same lawyer why?? If it's such a regular occurrence...

The women suing Weissman don't have the same lawyers..

Show me a case where 13 women all lied.  I'll wait

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Show me a case where 13 women all lied.  I'll wait

I"m not saying all these women are lying.. Show me where I said they were??

images.jpeg.16eafd187bb557c042d4012d9a443cf3.jpeg

15 murders and 2 women lied about this poo.. 

PS.. Love how you change from asking about 14 women lying so fast ...I wonder why ???hmmmmmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...