Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eagles trade #6 pick to Dolphins


DFive
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, davos said:

If ATL doesn't go QB it's LT.  That's the talk of all their circles.  Cinci is getting Burrow help...I don't know Miami's intentions yet (Chase?) but they've already got Austin Jackson as their LT.

So 4 QBs, 1 WR, Sewell, & Slater off?

So then, we could really be looking at Parsons, Pitts, or Waddle.

We’ll take parsons because panthers.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:
ZACH WILSONQB, COLLEGE PLAYER
zach_wilson.jpg

NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports the Eagles were interested to trading up to No. 3 overall, but only for BYU QB Zach Wilson. 

In other words, the Jets are locked in at Wilson at No. 2. After their designs on No. 3 were thwarted, the Eagles instead moved down to No. 12, getting a 2022 first-rounder from the Dolphins for the price of sliding only six spots. With Wilson seemingly the guy at No. 2, it would seem North Dakota State QB Trey Lance is the 49ers' most likely target at No. 3. 

Damn we fuged up so bad.

So, so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it too late to hire Doug Pederson to orchestrate our 2021 tank season? Because the chances of us being in the top 5 or top 10 again are gonna be low. I feel bad for CMC, DJ Moore, Brian Burns, Chinn, etc. 
 

Way to go Deshaun! You couldn’t just use PornHub like the rest of us?!

  • The D 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real question now is what ATL is going to do. Do they pick the last of the 4 QBs or go a different position? If ATL doesn't pick a QB then one of the four really can fall to us at 8 with Philly moving out of spot 6. Mia, Det, and Cincy don't need QBS. Unless someone leaps frog us again, we may still get a chance at a QB. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BleedinGreenNC said:

Thought this was a public forum? LOL!! Get ready for Teddy!

You'll need thicker skin than that to make it through another season my man. We have already witnessed Jimmy Clausen and David Carr wearing white gloves. This is child's play by comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...