Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB or Sewell at 9


Martin
 Share

Recommended Posts

If the Pats stay put they will lose out on the the top WRs, but if they trade with us then Cam could be throwing to Ja'marr Chase. Otherwise Cam will be throwing to trash, and that didn't work too well last season.

Edited by pantherj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before the sf trade, maybe 20% chance. After the lance, wilson, and fields pro days, 40%. With Pitts showing out at his pro day, it's 50% now. Crazy to think we could end up with a true top LT. imo he is better than the top OT the last 2 drafts at OT.

 

If he is there, I'm pretty sure I don't wait a minute to listen to calls. Go up and announce it. The 2 guys I would take ahead of him for sure wont be there. Honestly think he is #3 overall guy in a 4 stud draft ( TL, ZW, Pitts, and Sewell). So to get that at 8, sign me up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/31/2021 at 10:53 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

QB or trade down

If Slater or Sewell are there, it's hard to pass up a franchise LT, which we have sorely missed since Jordan Gross retired.  I agree though, if the QB isn't there, it's tempting not to just trade back and acquire picks to fill the many holes on this roster.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Soul Rebel said:

So, with Darnold here now and when the 8th pick comes up, who are we taking:

Sewell/Slater

Fields/Lance

Build a young wall around Darnold or bring in a rookie QB to compete after just trading for a 23 year old #3 overall pick?

Taking Sewell/slater at 8th pick rn

Build a wall around Darnold and Bring in Late-round Rookie QB at 3rd or 4th round  pick to complete for Starting QB?

I know this sound like good idea or nah to me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...