Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

There Appear To Be 2 Favorites To Land Teddy Bridgewater


KatsAzz
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Floppin said:

It would be absolutely depressingly hilarious if Bridgewater gets traded to the Texans and ends up starting in place of the disgraced Watson. What a crazy world.

Texans already signed Tyrod Taylor who was the Chargers starter going into the 2020 season.

They don't need Teddy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I suspect keeping him is no longer an option. I don't think the relationship between the current staff and Teddy appears to be the best. 

Yep. The organization and the fans have made it clear that he’s no longer welcome here. Brought that on himself too. The coaches were being supportive until he threw them under the bus.

Also the article in the OP is 100% speculation based on Denver inquiring earlier and Houston for obvious reasons, but I agree with Sizzlebuzz that there’s no need for Teddy with Tyrod on the Texans.

 

Edited by MechaZain
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Texans already signed Tyrod Taylor who was the Chargers starter going into the 2020 season.

They don't need Teddy.

They may need him if Watson is suspended right? Tyrod and Teddy sound like a combo that can get you 8 wins if they have a decent enough line. Isn't Tyrod a little better of a thrower statistically than Teddy though? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Texans already signed Tyrod Taylor who was the Chargers starter going into the 2020 season.

They don't need Teddy.

Ok? I'm not sure why you think that I care that much. It was clearly a sarcastic statement based on the Texans being mentioned in the OP. Also, Tyrod sucks worse than Teddy.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, YourLastThought said:

They may need him if Watson is suspended right? Tyrod and Teddy sound like a combo that can get you 8 wins if they have a decent enough line. Isn't Tyrod a little better of a thrower statistically than Teddy though? 

That's why Tyrod was signed.

Texans have 3 QB's on the roster, don't need Teddy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

I guess its Denver then. I still cant see how anybody gives us much at all anyhow. Something is better than nothing though I guess.

I think the league will wait it out like they did with Cam...

...Panthers will get bumpkiss.  

The only way the Panthers get any further return on TB5 is to keep him.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Keep thinking that. Teddy is as good as gone 

Don't get me wrong if I'm GM I'd trade him for a bag of Doritos to lose that contract of his but every team probably figures we are desperate and will just wait to hope he is cut. It's not like he is a hot commodity so.if he isn't cut I'm sure teams won't be losing sleep over it and talking about the one that got away if they don't get him. Damn, you could replace 15 TD's with almost any QB. I bet Will Grier could even sling the piss out the ball all season and luck into 10-15 TD's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...