Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Analytics that will shape Draft Strategy or my name isn't MHS831


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Captain Morgan said:

 

We have 16 players with first round grades.  Trading with NE (15) guarantees us one of them.  

Trading with WFT (19), we could get lucky and still get one.  If only 2 of the 5 QBs in draft are on list, and 5 get taken there is a decent chance one of our guys could fall to 19.  But because of the risk involved, I'd want a hell of a lot from the WFT in that trade.

And Morgan, I think there will be 3 CBs on OUR board at #8--Surtain, Horn, and Farley. Not sure about Newsome.  So to move back 7 spots you have know the needs and examine the others on the board then--and there are teams that need edge rushers, and I expect a run to go on them around the middle of the draft.  Parsons, a top 3 WR or 2 will be there--I think we can feel good about NE, be prepared to trade back up if we trade with WFT... IS that where you are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

IMO, it all comes down to compensation. I ain't movin back for peanuts. You make me happy, and away we go. 

 

The right haul gives us the opportunity at half a dozen good to great players. I think I can live with that.

Yes--I am sure we have rated these players.  I would give players point values that include need and position value as well as draft spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Yes--I am sure we have rated these players.  I would give players point values that include need and position value as well as draft spot.

 

Screw the Draft Chart. I want a haul. I deserve a haul. I want to fleece somebody. If I am giving up the 8th pick, I want somebody to pay big time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Man, that's the rub. What does "plus some" come to? Is an extra 2nd, and 3rd enough? Maybe the further we fall, the more it should cost?

 

I want to be greedy. lol

Me too.  Funny, when I do mocks, I trade and end up selecting 14 stud players and getting a full 2022 draft.  I sent them to Tep.  Let's see if I get offered a job.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Screw the Draft Chart. I want a haul. I deserve a haul. I want to fleece somebody. If I am giving up the 8th pick, I want somebody to pay big time.

Me too.  If I can't have Sewell, I want 3 starters and enough 2022 picks to make Darnold free.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Man, that's the rub. What does "plus some" come to? Is an extra 2nd, and 3rd enough? Maybe the further we fall, the more it should cost?

 

I want to be greedy. lol

https://www.google.com/amp/s/catcrave.com/2021/04/18/carolina-panthers-washington-perfect-trade-partner/amp/
 

This site has it as a 4th... kind of lame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Me too.  Funny, when I do mocks, I trade and end up selecting 14 stud players and getting a full 2022 draft.  I sent them to Tep.  Let's see if I get offered a job.

 

 

It's nice to have a dream. But, trust me. You don't want to put all your eggs in that one basket.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, that was a long-winded post by the OP to say we need a CB.  I already knew that, duh!  Now, I disagree it needs to be in the first as corner is probably the deepest position in the draft besides WR (and were are mostly good there).

We won't take one at #8; only in a trade back.  I'm certain of that.  If we trade back with Sewell already gone I won't be too perplexed.  If we trade back with Sewell still there, I can't say the same.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

And Morgan, I think there will be 3 CBs on OUR board at #8--Surtain, Horn, and Farley. Not sure about Newsome.  So to move back 7 spots you have know the needs and examine the others on the board then--and there are teams that need edge rushers, and I expect a run to go on them around the middle of the draft.  Parsons, a top 3 WR or 2 will be there--I think we can feel good about NE, be prepared to trade back up if we trade with WFT... IS that where you are?

 

after the pc last week, I feel CB is very much on our mind in the first.  I think Surtain and Horn are the targets, and one of the two could be there at 15.  It's a gamble.  

I'd take Newsome in the late first, and would move up to get him if we get enough capital in the trade and get a LT at 15.  

I wouldn't be surprise if Parsons wasn't even on our board but I haven't heard that.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Everyone knew the catch was secured and didn't move. That was clear to the entire audience. The only ones who thought it wasn't a catch were in the NYC home office. They knew they'd just offer an apology the next day.
    • NEVER FORGET!!!!   Canales was on no one's radar. Tepper couldn't get anyone to come here. He was all in on Ben Johnson. Nobody wants to work with Tepper, however Canales tenure may prove important for the next guy. This guy still has no idea what he's doing. 
    • The 4th down play was poor execution by Chuba. He didn't want to get physical like Rico and cut North South to lean on his blocks from Tremble and Ekwonu for half a yard. Also, the 3rd down play before that Bryce audibled out to a QB run and almost got the 1st down was on Chuba for not knowing the play call leading to poor execution. You can see Chuba's confusion when Bryce had to realign him. Then Chuba thought he was getting the handoff and was slow to develop his double team on the DE with Tremble. Then Chuba hesitated on pushing the block and just ran to the sideline making Bryce have to loop around him. This pulled the DE away from Tremble forcing Chuba to chip on the DE late and leaving the safety as a free defender. Chuba was suppose to double down on the DE to let Tremble peel off to the safety. This allows Bryce to set up his run to the inside or outside after the safety commits. You can also see Tremble walk over to talk to Chuba after the play and Chuba shrugs which tells me he didn't know what to do. The audible would have worked on 3rd and the dive would have worked on 4th. The plays were good calls and drawn up well. The question is why was Chuba unprepared for those plays in two critical back to back plays? I like Chuba as a 1st down RB and passing downs, but I have always seen him lacking the power and vision to be a short yardage power back. Chuba didn't come prepared for the Saints game or he was thrown into a position at the 3 spot that he was never prepared for.
×
×
  • Create New...