Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Take QB out of the equation


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

As bad as it sounds, even if he loses some claims, depending the severity, I still think tepper would be interested. If we have a backup plan all this is moot, and I’m on board for it 

Out of all the issues facing athletes and bouncing back from off the field stuff it's pretty easy to just NOT do IG massage ladies lol...unless man legitimately has some sort of issue like addiction or...who tf knows what. So to me as long as it isn't the worst of the things then it can be redeemable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cpt slay a ho said:

Yeah idk why that’s even being discussed, he was clearly not the first option, unless the jets weren’t willing to trade him at the time we were interested in Stafford 

This forum is quite an entity of isomerism and cliques. It's weird that even people that were staunchly in favor of a LT for months to give Sam a real chance changed their tune quick just to go along with the front office, and the crowd.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lemon said:

This forum is quite an entity of isomerism and cliques. It's weird that even people that were staunchly in favor of a LT for months to give Sam a real chance changed their tune quick just to go along with the front office, and the crowd.

*homerism

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

Out of all the issues facing athletes and bouncing back from off the field stuff it's pretty easy to just NOT do IG massage ladies lol...unless man legitimately has some sort of issue like addiction or...who tf knows what. So to me as long as it isn't the worst of the things then it can be redeemable

Yeah, barring something egregious that would put his football career in jeopardy, once his legal issues are over some team is going to bite regardless, we see it year in and out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Yeah hence why I said the same thing with Teddy, we’ve seen this fail once, granted Teddy isn’t the athlete etc darnold is, and doesn’t have the potential darnold does, Real risky business for first time owner and coach. 

I wasn't a fan of Teddy and Teddy was 4 year older and not rated as high coming into the league.. So it's a bit different..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Lemon said:

It's going to be hard to develop a QB that sees ghosts with a poor offensive line.

Wow if not looking good against the best defense in football that year is a problem.. Then Pat Mahomes Superbowl performance should have you thinking KC should trade him.. Are Aaron  Rodgers against the Bears on Monday night 2 years ago should have been done..Lol

At this point I don't give fug.. I like the pick you don't ... cool ...moving on..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Wow if not looking good against the best defense in football that year is a problem.. Then Pat Mahomes Superbowl performance should have you thinking KC should trade him.. Are Aaron  Rodgers against the Bears on Monday night 2 years ago should have been done..Lol

At this point I don't give fug.. I like the pick you don't ... cool ...moving on..

I mean you're responding to one of the neg repped people....learn who to not respond to playa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

I wasn't a fan of Teddy and Teddy was 4 year older and not rated as high coming into the league.. So it's a bit different..

True, but Teddy was coming off that little win streak in NO, at least he looked good on the nfl field before we signed him.

granted darnold had gase, I like our staff and I do think gase is bad, but I’m not sold on our staff being overwhelming better to flip darnold into the qb he was projected to be coming out. 

but I could be wrong, I just hope that have a backup plan that’s more solid because we’ve been doing the exact opposite of what was said in these pressers lately 
 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Guess we can dispense with the dumbass narrative that Darnold was just a fallback in case we couldn't get someone better, huh?

The dumb narrative is that Darnold would have prevented us from taking a QB we really liked.

The only thing passing on Fields and Jones tells us is that we really didn’t like them.

If Trevor or Wilson would have fell do you honestly think we would have passed because of Darnold.  Maybe even Lance, who knows where we really had him ranked.  
 

The team signed Darnold because they felt like he is was their best realistic option, doesn’t mean he is was their 1st or even 3rd choice.  Not really that complicated of a concept.

He has tools, let’s see what the staff can get out of him.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

The dumb narrative is that Darnold would have prevented us from taking a QB we really liked.

The only thing passing on Fields and Jones tells us is that we really didn’t like them.

If Trevor or Wilson would have fell do you honestly think we would have passed because of Darnold.  Maybe even Lance, who knows where we really had him ranked.  
 

The team signed Darnold because they felt like he is was their best realistic option, doesn’t mean he is was their 1st or even 3rd choice.  Not really that complicated of a concept.

He has tools, let’s see what the staff can get out of him.

If that helps you sleep better 😃

It's been said that we'll likely be picking up that 5th year option shortly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Do you think we would have passed on Trevor or Wilson? 

Lawrence? Probably not, but then if we were in a position to take Lawrence we probably wouldn't have traded for another quarterback.

Wilson? Unknown. Not every team was as high on him as the Jets were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Lawrence? Probably not, but then if we were in a position to take Lawrence we probably wouldn't have traded for another quarterback.

Wilson? Unknown. Not every team was as high on him as the Jets were.

Exactly, a lot of people around here said Darnold wouldn’t prevent you from taking a QB you really like.   That’s a true statement.

Wasn’t a QB at 8 we really liked that much.

Not sure why that concept really bothered you so much.

Did some fans like Fields enough to take him with Darnold here? Yes.  Did you? No

but those are opinions, and your opinion could totally be right, time will tell.

but saying Darnold prevents you from taking a QB you really like is an absolute statement that isn’t true

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Exactly, a lot of people around here said Darnold wouldn’t prevent you from taking a QB you really like.   That’s a true statement.

Wasn’t a QB at 8 we really liked that much.

Not sure why that concept really bothered you so much.

Did some fans like Fields enough to take him with Darnold here? Yes.  Did you? No

but those are opinions, and your opinion could totally be right, time will tell.

but saying Darnold prevents you from taking a QB you really like is an absolute statement that isn’t true

What was actually being said was that Darnold was only a just in case / last resort / insurance pickup because the team didn't believe any of the top five quarterbacks would fall to them.

Clearly, that turned out to be wrong seeing as two of the top five were available to us and we passed on both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...