Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers trading back for the THIRD TIME


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

they traded a 4 and 5 to get two 3s, then traded ONE of those 3s to get TWO 4ths and a 5th. much better than you're trying to make it like. but you keep hatin

oh wow well this changes things, as long as we’re stacking meaningful picks

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Move up?? Did you not just watch us draft?

That was this year. It’s very possible our strategy is different next year. We should be in better position after a FA with a good amount of cap, and if Darnold plays well, we will have less needs. I see us moving up next year to go after one or two guys we feel are the missing pieces. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

I dont have a problem with it. Nothing wrong with playing the long game. I dont think we will use them to necessarily move up since we're recouping picks for the Darnold trade. We will prob trade back again next year too.

Maybe, depends on our situation after FA next year. I could see us making a move or two in order to get who we believe are the missing pieces. Just my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

So we had picks with value and we traded them for picks with much less value. I don't even know what to say.

So I guess you missed the big conversation over the weeks about teams putting value in next years draft because of the abbreviated offseason and better chance to scout players next year... Getting assets back while still adding talent isn't some BS concept.. It's actually being a good GM..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

That was this year. It’s very possible our strategy is different next year. We should be in better position after a FA with a good amount of cap, and if Darnold plays well, we will have less needs. I see us moving up next year to go after one or two guys we feel are the missing pieces. Just my opinion.

I am gonna be honest, I hope eventually a strategy will emerge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

So I guess you missed the big conversation over the weeks about teams putting value in next years draft because of the abbreviated offseason and better chance to scout players next year... Getting assets back while still adding talent isn't some BS concept.. It's actually being a good GM..

I guess. Not sure that will actually work but whatever makes them feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...