Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers to Panthers?

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, ForJimmy said:

It’s reminding me of a certain poster who loved the two TE set offense.

I'm pretty sure it's the same poster.

It's his thing. He gets attached to an idea and spams it everywhere till eventually he pisses enough people off to get himself banned (Linville's already warned him).

I've tried to persuade him to listen more and not spam so much but you can see how that's going 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, none of that stuff refers to roster decisions, just staffing decisions.

Dude, I get that you hero worship Tepper, but you're reading your own narrative into pretty much everything here. And as such, getting it completely wrong.

The most important things you need to know are that, when Fitterer was hired, Tepper specifically stated that he was not an evaluator and wasn't going to try to be.

Likewise, Matt Rhule said in his recent interview with Rich Eisen, "Dave leaves the football stuff to me and Scott" (exact quote, not paraphrased).

And to top it all off, if you read Gantt's war room article, it clearly describes Tepper not being part of player choices.

You can continue to believe whatever you want, but the reality has already been spoken by the people who are there. You can put as much work as you want to into  spinning it, but it doesn't change reality.

Who does Fitterer report to?

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:
6 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It’s reminding me of a certain poster who loved the two TE set offense.

I'm pretty sure it's the same poster.

It's his thing. He gets attached to an idea and spams it everywhere till eventually he pisses enough people off to get himself banned (Linville's already warned him).

I've tried to persuade him to listen more and not spam so much but you can see how that's going

Past guesses have been Chuck, and some guy with a middle-eastern name...

...who else?

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's his thing. He gets attached to an idea and spams it everywhere till eventually he pisses enough people off to get himself banned (Linville's already warned him).

I've tried to persuade him to listen more and not spam so much but you can see how that's going 😕

Another categorically false statement by you.

Buddy, nobody listens to you and especially not moi...

Log off bud, you're embarrassing yourself.

image.thumb.png.b4de215e1377c6e4d08cfd8fc0de8ba8.png

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayflip Proficient

jayflip

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

It’s reminding me of a certain poster who loved the two TE set offense.

 

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm pretty sure it's the same poster.

It's his thing. He gets attached to an idea and spams it everywhere till eventually he pisses enough people off to get himself banned (Linville's already warned him).

I've tried to persuade him to listen more and not spam so much but you can see how that's going 😕

fug I miss Sanjay. If it were him though he’d be spamming us re: Dan Arnold and Tommyknocker. 
 

 

AB97A0E5-3600-4111-9C6E-C35F0F1A6B1E.jpeg

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...