Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Brett began his career with 3 straight winning seasons as a starting QB...there is nothing "bad" about that. 

Is Sam injury prone?

Must of had a great team because his stats and rating was on par with Sam on year 3. The Golden Calf of Bristol took his team to the playoffs as a starting QB and won on the road on the playoffs. Must be good. Teddy was 5-0 as a Saints starter. Must be good. Taysum Hill has a winning record as a starting QB, so why are they not starting him? Is Sean Payton not smart enough to realize a winning record is what makes a QB good? See wins are the sign of a good TEAM. Troy Aiken also had a losing record after year 3. Started off 1-15, that’s Clausen bad! 19-29 after year 3. Sound have cut his ass right?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Must of had a great team because his stats and rating was on par with Sam on year 3. The Golden Calf of Bristol took his team to the playoffs as a starting QB and won on the road on the playoffs. Must be good. Teddy was 5-0 as a Saints starter. Must be good. Taysum Hill has a winning record as a starting QB, so why are they not starting him? Is Sean Payton not smart enough to realize a winning record is what makes a QB good? See wins are the sign of a good TEAM. Troy Aiken also had a losing record after year 3. Started off 1-15, that’s Clausen bad! 19-29 after year 3. Sound have cut his ass right?

OK so the next Brett Favre is now in the fold...

...you heard it here first folks!

{big toke from the bong of hope}

 

FB36FAE1-B010-4014-B818-95C2E2AD6ED4.jpeg

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

OK so the next Brett Favre is now in the fold...

...you heard it here first folks!

{big toke from the bong of hope}

 

FB36FAE1-B010-4014-B818-95C2E2AD6ED4.jpeg

Ahhh so you have no response. Perfect. You wanted some examples I gave you some. Can’t help it if it didn’t line up with your trolling. 
Ask for data. Receive data. Try to change data. Then give up and mock the other person. Well done! Nice debate. Go study the Appaloosa Model some more, it’s the only thing you know because no one else cares enough about it to fact check you on it.

Edited by ForJimmy
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Ahhh so you have no response. Perfect. You wanted some examples I gave you some. Can’t help it if it didn’t line up with your trolling. 
Ask for data. Receive data. Try to change data. Then give up and mock the other person. Well done! Nice debate. Go study the Appaloosa Model some more, it’s the only thing you know because no one else cares enough about it to fact check you on it.

Oh I responded...you must have missed it.  

"...has there ever been a QB drafted top-3 who only failed with his initial team...was given up on and traded for a paltry round 2 pick...

...and then went on to have agreat career at his very next stop?"

Favre ain't it. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Oh I responded...you must have missed it.  

"...has there ever been a QB drafted top-3 who only failed with his initial team...was given up on and traded for a paltry round 2 pick...

...and then went on to have agreat career at his very next stop?"

 

Favre ain't it. 

 

Why is the "given up on" so crucial for the comparison?   

Why does a turn around example you are looking for require jets level of stupidity?  Why must the many examples of 3 yr suckage with a turn around be followed by cut ties?

Because the jets are masters of evaluating talent and so Darnold must suck because the jets said so?    

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Oh I responded...you must have missed it.  

"...has there ever been a QB drafted top-3 who only failed with his initial team...was given up on and traded for a paltry round 2 pick...

...and then went on to have agreat career at his very next stop?"

 

Favre ain't it. 

He looked just as bad his first 3 years as several QBs including the great Brett Favre. The Jets franchise trading him has no relevance other than adding one more asterisk so you can exclude him from this list. Had we found someone else you would just add another like “in the last 10 years” or “for a future 2nd.” So plenty of QBs have been where he is at and turned it around. Take your trolling someone else. Honestly I’m not even saying he will turn it around, I’m just annoyed at posters who come on here just to talk down about this team. At least some of the others are actually good at it though and have actual data to back it up. You just tried and failed pretty bad....

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SBBlue said:

 

Why is the "given up on" so crucial for the comparison?   

Why does a turn around example you are looking for require jets level of stupidity?  Why must the many examples of 3 yr suckage with a turn around be followed by cut ties?

Because the jets are masters of evaluating talent and so Darnold must suck because the jets said so?    

Because it’s the extra bit of info needed to try to prove his point no matter how irrelevant it is. They also need to have been drafted on an even year during a leap year. See it’s never happened before therefore it can never happen!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SBBlue said:

 

Why is the "given up on" so crucial for the comparison?   

Why does a turn around example you are looking for require jets level of stupidity?  Why must the many examples of 3 yr suckage with a turn around be followed by cut ties?

Because the jets are masters of evaluating talent and so Darnold must suck because the jets said so?    

What is the Darnold bull-case predicated on?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2021 at 4:15 PM, glenwo2 said:

Also, the fact that he managed to finish out his last 2 seasons with More TDs than INTs still, is a testament to his talent.

In fact, in his "best" season as a Jet, he had 2 games where he threw a bunch of INTs.   Take away those two games and he'd have been 17 TDs and 6 (yes...SIX!) INTs.   

In the ghost game, the pats ran cover 0 blitz over and over and the jets couldn't handle it....five interceptions.

The Patriots made Sam Darnold and Patrick Mahomes see ghosts with the exact same blitz - YouTube

 

In 2020, on 68.9% of his dropbacks, he wasn’t even blitzed. That means defenses were getting to him without sending extra defenders leaving LB's back for coverage.

 

 

 

 

Edited by SBBlue
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yep so its essentially working against us
    • Solid point about the rookie contract especially since I believe Tepper and company brought that up, he was so good we could sign other players while he is on a rookie deal and capitalize on the cap space. Sorta like Seattle did with Russ while he was on a rookie deal. But, problem is Bryce isn’t close to that version of Russ and Tepper sucks as an owner. 
    • Look at who they’re interviewing there.  parcels, aikman, Peyton etc. the youngest guy is KOC who’s forty.  The passing game 25, 35, 45 years ago looked less glamorous to be sure but it was far more complex. You didn’t have these packages where you’d make quick checks, every play was its own thing, basically everyone was playing under center etc. once the nfl got out of the dead ball era things became very complex very quickly and they hadnt figured out a way to truncate it. Plus it was nowhere in college or high school. Vertical passing attacks just didn’t exist.  So yeah parcells probably does have that view because that’s what he came up in. Aikman had to learn that when he got to the nfl. Aikman was so lost his rookie season the cowboys almost took Jeff George first overall in 1990.  Today the learning curve is a lot lower. pro concepts today borrow a great deal from the college game now. Tons of air raid stuff, RPO, pistol, etc. even though everything is faster at every position, it’s schematically more simple. The learning curve is nowhere near what it was for even Peyton manning when he came out.  plus, prospects today are basically pro qbs from the time they’re in middle school. Bryce Young for example lived in invite only qb camps since he reached his max height at 12 years old. The whole “they shouldn’t get paid because they get a degree for free” was always just an insincere argument from racist old people, but no one even pretends to make it anymore. Playing qb at a division 1 school is a full time job for years before you even get to campus.  And that is all they do. The days of people excelling in multiple sports to the point there’s pro interest and then just choosing one or the other and succeeding are over. Aikman was drafted by the Mets out of high school and decided to go start as a freshman at Oklahoma.  The exact opposite is happening now, to the point you’ve got guys going to play baseball for a few years, coming back to college football, and playing until they’re like 27.  that’s actually one of the theories about why darnold isn’t better than everyone feels he should be. He only played two years of college football. In highschool he was first team all everything in every sport. Dude has an insane athletic pedigree. But there’s at least four years of highschool invite camps he never got to go to. You can’t just be the most athletic guy in the room anymore.  So obviously the older guys are complaining about how things are done; it’s what offer guys do. But the pro game today is much more accessible for these guys than it was back in their day, and the players are more ready for the transition. Like is anyone defending Anthony Richardson? What im saying is we know what Bryce young is and we should t wait for waiting’s sake. 
×
×
  • Create New...