Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If there had been zero questions, he never would have left stop #1.

And in fact, there were major questions, especially about his shoulder. That's why only two teams really pursued him.

Health issues, and ability to play the game at the highest level issues, are completely different animals.

Brees had unequivocally proven he was capable of the latter before departing SD.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Health issues, and ability to play the game at the highest level issues, are completely different animals.

Brees had unequivocally proven he was capable of the latter before departing SD.

And again, if he had "unequivocally proven" anything, he wouldn't have been replaced and let go and more than two teams would have pursued him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

 

 

Brees didn't "only fail" and in fact was a Pro Bowl QB at his first stop -- there was zero questions that he'd be a success at stop #2. 

In Brees first 3 seasons he was completing less than 60% of his passes and had more int than TD, but continue with your revisionist history. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Nonsense. 

Literally everyone, including me, is pulling for Sam to be a smashing success and is eager to watch it play out -- literally one of the most compelling storylines across the entire league going into the season.  

Could've fooled me...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

In Brees first 3 seasons he was completing less than 60% of his passes and had more int than TD, but continue with your revisionist history. 

61.3% completion rate.  If you need to be walked through a weighted-average calculation just say the word.

55-38 on the TD to INT count.

Talk about "revisionist history"...LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

61.3% completion rate.  If you need to be walked through a weighted-average calculation just say the word.

55-38 on the TD to INT count.

Talk about "revisionist history"...LOL.

I said his first 3 years, seriously keep up. 

Year 1: 55% completion 1 td 0 int

Year 2: 60% completion 17 td 16 int

Year 3: 57% completion 11 td 15 int

Total TD 29 total int 31 57% completion on average over the three years. 

My god it is there on the internet for anyone to see, try to troll better.

I guess if you use his first 3 good years, you can come up with those numbers you pulled out of your ass.

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, frankw said:

This Brees thing again? Honestly it isn't even fair to Sam Darnold. In 15 seasons with New Orleans after leaving San Diego he only dipped below 65% completion twice and even then that was at 63% and 64%. He is currently the all time completions leader.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/history/leaders/_/stat/complete

I am once again not saying he is the next Drew Brees. I am pointing out that you cannot judge a guy for 3 seasons playing for one of the worst coaches in the league and with one of the weakest rosters. The jets franchise is awful, no way around it.

Not everyone comes into the league as an immediate all-pro, guys careers have different trajectories. 

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

I said his first 3 years, seriously keep up. 

Year 1: 55% completion 1 td 0 int

Year 2: 60% completion 17 td 16 int

Year 3: 57% completion 11 td 15 int

Total TD 29 total int 31 57% completion on average over the three years. 

My god it is there on the internet for anyone to see, try to troll better.

I guess if you use his first 3 good years, you can come up with those numbers you pulled out of your ass.

 

He never started a game his rookie year and only ever played in 1...

...doesn't count -- and you know it. 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

He never started a game his rookie year and only ever played in 1...

...doesn't count -- and you know it. 

How does it not count? I said his first three seasons. It started to click for him in year 4, before that he was ass and you know it. You may not realize it, but guys develop when they are in the league.

Do you think Rodgers would have been as good as he is if he was thrown into the fire his rookie season? 

Steve Young sucked in Tampa, Favre sucked in Atlanta.

Rich Gannon, Jim Plunkett, I'm sure there are others out there as well. 

Some guys come into the league and they are ready from day 1, some need to be coached up and have time to develop.

I have no idea if The Darnold will redeem himself or still suck, and neither do you. However I hope Darnold can put it together instead of just saying he will suck so you can fire up the " I told you guys!"

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

You can hope Darnold turns it around with using outliers like Brees and Young as your goto examples. Come On Reaction GIF by GIPHY News

Lets just throw him in the fuging trash before he ever plays a down for us.

I named much more than Brees and Young. They were only some examples.

Do I think Darnold will be half as good as either? Not likely, but it would be great if he is. 

Its a better outlook than "oh noes we did not draft a QB who was the 4th or 5th best in the draft" "woe is me we are not going to win like this"

If Darnold sucks like Teddy then he gets replaced.

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Lets just throw him in the fuging trash before he ever plays a down for us.

I named much more than Brees and Young. They were only some examples.

Do I think Darnold will be half as good as either? Not likely, but it would be great if he is. 

Its a better outlook than "oh noes we did not draft a QB who was the 4th or 5th best in the draft" "woe is me we are not going to win like this"

If Darnold sucks like Teddy then he gets replaced.

Do you overreact with everything? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...