Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

You just aren't going to get through to some of these people. There were folks trying to shut down any dissent about Teddy Bridgewater until the bitter end last year.  Optimism is good but shifting blame in all directions and then grasping for any favorable comparison before a real snap has been taken is unnecessary. Let him show us something. The opener is the perfect opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

And if we go by Passer Rating? INTs? YPA? TDPA? TOPA? Completion %? 7-9 Dolphins vs 4-12 Jets?

The evidence is stacked against you. You're losing this argument.

A QB can have a passer rating of 158.3, which is perfect, and still have a 39.0 QBR.

This case is a perfect example of this. All the numbers tell you Tannehill had the better year by every possible measurement except for ESPN's convoluted QBR metric.

It seems you need a refresher on QBR

Total QBR takes into account the level of difficulty the opponent team's defense is based on the opponent's’ defensive FPI, among other factors.

Conceptualizing the detail Total QBR puts in can be explained through the 2015 NFC Wild Card game between the Green Bay Packers and the Washington Redskins.[6] Aaron Rodgers of the Packers completed 21 of 36 passes for 210 yards, 2 touchdowns, and 0 interceptions, which computes to a 93.5 passer rating. Kirk Cousins of the Redskins completed 29 of 46 passes for 329 yards with 1 touchdown and 0 interceptions, computing a 91.7 passer rating. Observing these statistics, one is likely to conclude that Cousins and Rodgers had similar success and that it was likely a close game. However, the Packers won, 35-18, and much of the reason for that can be attributed to Rodgers' overall play, not just his passing numbers.

Traditional passer statistics omit the rest of the impact that these quarterbacks made. Cousins also took 6 sacks, had 3 fumbles (1 lost), and 2 pre-snap penalties on Washington's offense. Rodgers, on the other hand, took only one sack, did not fumble, and drew a number of defensive penalties to keep drives alive. Rodgers manufactured five scoring drives, posting an 82.4 Total QBR. Cousins’ errors resulted in a Total QBR of just 58.9 and were a big factor in Washington losing the game.

 

Your beef isn't with me...its with ESPN.

I know its hard to accept, but Tannehnill had the WORST QBR in the league in 2018, lower than rookie Darnolds.  His overall play sucked and it was reflected in the QBR.  He was traded afterwards.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

It seems you need a refresher on QBR

Total QBR takes into account the level of difficulty the opponent team's defense is based on the opponent's’ defensive FPI, among other factors.

Conceptualizing the detail Total QBR puts in can be explained through the 2015 NFC Wild Card game between the Green Bay Packers and the Washington Redskins.[6] Aaron Rodgers of the Packers completed 21 of 36 passes for 210 yards, 2 touchdowns, and 0 interceptions, which computes to a 93.5 passer rating. Kirk Cousins of the Redskins completed 29 of 46 passes for 329 yards with 1 touchdown and 0 interceptions, computing a 91.7 passer rating. Observing these statistics, one is likely to conclude that Cousins and Rodgers had similar success and that it was likely a close game. However, the Packers won, 35-18, and much of the reason for that can be attributed to Rodgers' overall play, not just his passing numbers.

Traditional passer statistics omit the rest of the impact that these quarterbacks made. Cousins also took 6 sacks, had 3 fumbles (1 lost), and 2 pre-snap penalties on Washington's offense. Rodgers, on the other hand, took only one sack, did not fumble, and drew a number of defensive penalties to keep drives alive. Rodgers manufactured five scoring drives, posting an 82.4 Total QBR. Cousins’ errors resulted in a Total QBR of just 58.9 and were a big factor in Washington losing the game.

 

Your beef isn't with me...its with ESPN.

I know its hard to accept, but Tannehnill had the WORST QBR in the league in 2018, lower than rookie Darnolds.  His overall play sucked and it was reflected in the QBR.  He was traded afterwards.

 

 

 

No my beef isn't with ESPN at all. I don't think QBR is a great stat because of what we're talking about right here. 

Ryan Tannehill outplayed Sam Darnold by a noticeable margin, and he rated Tannehill as the worst QB.

When you look at the numbers, Tannehill's low QBR is even an outlier by his previous stats and QBR. 

Frankly, it doesn't make sense for his QBR to be that low.

I mean, how about this from In 2015 from QBR

Ryan Fitzpatrick > Tom Brady

Tyrod Taylor > Ben Roethlisberger

Jay Cutler > Philip Rivers

Brian Hoyer > Russel Wilson

Ryan Mallet > Cam Newton, Andrew Luck, Matthew Stafford, Joe Flacco, Nick Foles, Sam Bradford

The 4th best QBR game of 2015 went to Teddy Bridgewater who went 14/18 for 153 yards and 1 TD

The best QBR of all time at this point was Charlie Batch in 2010 with a stat line of: 12/17 186 yards, 3 TDs, and 2INTs

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

Ryan Tannehill outplayed Sam Darnold by a noticeable margin.

No he didn't

The rest of your post attacked QBR.  I get your beef, it makes Tannehill look bad.  I didn't give Tannehill the WORST QBR in the league in 2018.  That was ESPN.

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

No he didn't

The rest of your post attacked QBR.  I get your beef, it makes Tannehill look bad.  I didn't give Tannehill the WORST QBR in the league in 2018.  That was ESPN.

So you're telling me that Ryan Mallet was a better QB than

Cam Newton

Andrew Luck

Matthew Stafford

Joe Flacco

Nick Foles

Sam Bradford in 2015?

You're telling me that Charlie Batch had the best QB game of all time in 2010?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Madwolf said:

So you're telling me that Ryan Mallet was a better QB than

Cam Newton

Andrew Luck

Matthew Stafford

Joe Flacco

Nick Foles

Sam Bradford in 2015?

You're telling me that Charlie Batch had the best QB game of all time in 2010?

Go on, keep attacking QBR.  Thats fine. 

I know Tannehills <2000 yard season in 2018 looks pretty good to you, it just doesn't to me, ESPN or the Miami Dolphins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Go on, keep attacking QBR.  Thats fine. 

I know Tannehills <2000 yard season in 2018 looks pretty good to you, it just doesn't to me, ESPN or the Miami Dolphins.

If we compare apples to apples. Had both QBs thrown the same number of passes Tannehill would have had 2,980 yards. 

But feel free to dig into TDs, TOs, completion %, wins, losses, etc.

You seem to keep avoiding these topics over and over and over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Charlie Batch's amazing performance, things have changed a bit.

Lamar Jackson had 4 of the Top10 QBR performances of all time to Tom Brady's 1. And as a Louisville Cardinal fan, I fully support the belief that Lamar Jackson is already 4 times better than Tom Brady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

10 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

If we compare apples to apples. Had both QBs thrown the same number of passes Tannehill would have had 2,980 yards. 

We don't know why Tannehill had fewer attempts.  A lot of 3 and outs? Maybe they didn't extend drives, or because Gase ran a lot.  

QBR takes situation into account and tries to rate quarterback contribution.  Its imperfect.

Look, your not going to convince me that Tannehill was any better than Darnold in 2018 and I'm not going to convince you otherwise.

Can we agree on the hope that Darnold sees a similar rebound?

 

 

 

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

 

We don't know why Tannehill have fewer attempts.  A lot of 3 and outs? Maybe they didn't extend drives, or because Gase ran a lot.  

QBR takes situation into account and tries to rate quarterback contribution.  Its imperfect.

Look, your not going to convince me that Tannehill was any better than Darnold in 2018 and I'm not going to convince you otherwise.

Can we agree on the hope that Darnold sees a similar rebound?

 

 

 

Actually it's not really a mystery. Tannehill was hurt that season. He played in less games, and had to come out of a few.

Edited by Madwolf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

Actually it's not really a mystery. Tannehill was hurt that season. He played in less games, and had to come out of a few.

So we can't even agree on the hope that Darnold sees a similar rebound?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the same thing, they don’t have any better options especially since Christiansen is out for the year 
    • It wasn’t completely his fault, but outside of two throws and one or two scrambles he didn’t do much to help. His accuracy was all over the place, numerous passes that were placed poorly and didn’t give the receiver a good chance to catch the ball or do anything with it after. He also continues to display terrible pocket awareness. Even the sacks could have been avoided, they weren’t immediate like the pressure we got on Shough at times. Bryce just often has no feel for pressure and stands there waiting to get sacked after numerous seconds have passed. 
    • I really fuging hate this era in so many ways.  I look at those Adin Ross and Neon kids, and I just wonder why tf are they famous?  Why would anyone be desperate enough to gain THAT audience that they’d risk money, career, disciplinary action to go up there and associate with those fuging dweebs?  And back in my day, racist peers got their ass beat.  And not endorsing or approving bully culture, but checks and balances and all…  had those two been bullied, or at the very least humbled, they wouldn’t be famous and glorified for being the fuging idiots they are now.  It seriously pisses me off… they both have done and said multiple, openly racist stuff and major media keeps pushing them, talking about them, and propping them up… and then dummies like Puka who don’t need the platform or exposure lend their celebrity to them.  fuging idiot… and even the other streamers, I don’t get - Speed, Kai…  I don’t understand making nobodies famous at all, but there is at least entertainment value to some degree there, and I could see how young, impressionable kids would find them something to aspire to (sadly), or view as “cool.”  But Ross and Neon?  They’re just shitty, shitty nerds with big ass mouths. I’ve went back recently and watched some classics (in two very different eras and categories 😂)  like Robocop and Idiocracy.  And what I find fascinating is how both movies illustrate how stupid society became by showing what the citizenry is entertained by.  In both, society became anti-intellectual and the citizenry were entertained by lowest denominator, primal-type absurdity - poo like, “Ouch! My Balls!”  Or on Robocop, a guy is a watching a show where they are smashing cakes on ladies’ breasts and then a guy says a line as the camera zooms in like, “I’d buy that for a dollar!” and the audience thinks it’s hilarious.  That’s where I feel like we are now.  Like who watches that clip with Puka and thinks any of that poo is funny or cool?  If I was Puka, I’d honestly be wondering why tf I’m hanging out with these beta ass, racist, cretin ass weirdos.
×
×
  • Create New...