Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Le’Veon Bell on Jets offense under Gase


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

There have been quite a few players, and even more analysts, who have taken their shots at Adam Gase. When it comes to who is to blame for losses and poor performances in football the QB is the face of every franchise and gets most of the praise and blame. It is the coaches, however, who make the choices that put QBs and the whole team in position to win or lose. I Think Sam definitely deserves some of the Blame (everyone on the Jets Team does), but Gase is the guy who brought in a staff and asked them the help the players execute game plans that didn't seem to put his players in position to win many games.

The nugget about the Jets that seemed to me to be the most indicative of his poor coaching would be the apparent criticism several jets players (A. Williamson, B. McDougald) gave about practices and how slow and bad practices were (players apparently did not practice hard or with enthusiasm). If players aren't putting in the work- and coaches aren't holding them high standards during practice that will be evident on Sunday.

Edited by Michael G
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I would have to disagree. The Browns are/were a historically dysfunctional franchise and I believe Hue still has the record for lowest winning percentage as head coach with more than one full season of experience. 3-36-1. Hard to beat that kind of futility. And I definitely remember those teams. The Gase Jets would probably beat them every time.

The other coaches listed were good at something (OC, DC).  Gase has never been good at anything.  That’s what I’m getting at.  He, himself, not his team or the org.  Just him.  He’s not good.  He’s objectively bad.  To me that makes him the worst.  I’ve said this was only my opinion a few times now.  Gase is the worstest ever, ever, ever. (Fingers in ears, lalalala)

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L-TownCat said:

The other coaches listed were good at something (OC, DC).  Gase has never been good at anything.  That’s what I’m getting at.  He, himself, not his team or the org.  Just him.  He’s not good.  He’s objectively bad.  To me that makes him the worst.  I’ve said this was only my opinion a few times now.  Gase is the worstest ever, ever, ever. (Fingers in ears, lalalala)

Lol. I don't think he was the worst in terms of overall results but, yes, he probably was the least worthy of even making that step up.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Gase is basically what would've happened if Mike Shula would've gotten a head coaching gig.

 

tenor.gif?itemid=16170678

 

Every 1st play on O, run up the gut....no yards cloud of dust.   My children caught on.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L-TownCat said:

The other coaches listed were good at something (OC, DC).  Gase has never been good at anything.  That’s what I’m getting at.  He, himself, not his team or the org.  Just him.  He’s not good.  He’s objectively bad.  To me that makes him the worst.  I’ve said this was only my opinion a few times now.  Gase is the worstest ever, ever, ever. (Fingers in ears, lalalala)

It's really, really hard to top Kiffin's Raiders stint or McDaniels' Broncos stint which was low key every bit as much of a trainwreck of dysfunction as Kiffin's Raiders trainwreck.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's really, really hard to top Kiffin's Raiders stint or McDaniels' Broncos stint which was low key every bit as much of a trainwreck of dysfunction as Kiffin's Raiders trainwreck.

One hit wonders.  Gase is the gift that keeps on breaking.  

(Is that how it goes?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think there's some colleges out there that would strongly disagree on that regarding Kiffin.

I agree.  I think he is the worst (NFL) Head coach.  I still have Bob Stoops above all other shitty football coaches. (I honestly don’t even know why he bothers me so much)

Oh no, NOW I remember!  It’s because they called him Big Game Bob and it was a worse misnomer than Riverboat Ron.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Michael G said:

There have been quite a few players, and even more analysts, who have taken their shots at Adam Gase. When it comes to who is to blame for losses and poor performances in football the QB is the face of every franchise and gets most of the praise and blame. It is the coaches, however, who make the choices that put QBs and the whole team in position to win or lose. I Think Sam definitely deserves some of the Blame (everyone on the Jets Team does), but Gase is the guy who brought in a staff and asked them the help the players execute game plans that didn't seem to put his players in position to win many games.

The nugget about the Jets that seemed to me to be the most indicative of his poor coaching would be the apparent criticism several jets players (A. Williamson, B. McDougald) gave about practices and how slow and bad practices were (players apparently did not practice hard or with enthusiasm). If players aren't putting in the work- and coaches aren't holding them high standards during practice that will be evident on Sunday.

So in other words, Bell was simply repeating a truth about Adam Gase (that he basically sucks as Head Coach).    

Strange how that observation deserved a Poo according to you, @kungfoodude🤨

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Exactly what I suggested held back the whole offense under Gase. Terrible scheme, no audibles and predictable play calling. Night and day different from what we have here.

Anybody remember the name of that other “bust” QB under Gase that found a better situation and then magically began to look like an NFL starting QB?  Did that happen?  Was that a dream I had?  He got better coaches, talent, and a running game.  Tammany Hill?  Fanny Thrill?  Tosser Pill?

Ah.. so close…

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Anybody remember the name of that other “bust” QB under Gase that found a better situation and then magically began to look like an NFL starting QB?  Did that happen?  Was that a dream I had?  He got better coaches, talent, and a running game.  Tammany Hill?  Fanny Thrill?  Tosser Pill?

Ah.. so close…

please let it happen again...please let it happen again.🙏

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

please let it happen again...please let it happen again.🙏

 

2 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

I consulted the oracle….

spacer.png

I would be absolutely SHOCKED if Sam does not perform well with this offense.  

Of course, the other key is the O-Line keeping him upright and him not running for his life like he did in NY.

We'll soon find out.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

 

I would be absolutely SHOCKED if Sam does not perform well with this offense.  

Of course, the other key is the O-Line keeping him upright and him not running for his life like he did in NY.

We'll soon find out.

We were mediocre last year and barring injury, looks like mediocre again.  Moton is one of the better olineman in the league.   If Christensen starts anywhere, there will be rookie mistakes.

Rhule's interest in Tremble as  a blocking tightend/h-back has me wondering.  I bet Tremble stays in a good portion of the time for pass protection.  Rhule cannot be that excited about his catching.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...