Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

King of Wisconsin… Giannis or Rodgers?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, toldozer said:

Take one player off that team and the bucks are ass. Hornets roster last year was more talented if Giannis got hurt.  

Complete BS.

They closed out ATL in the Eastern Conference Finals with the big boy on the bench..

The only Bobcats player who might crack the starting lineup in Milwaukee is Ball...nobody else would ever make it off the bench.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Complete BS.

They closed out ATL in the Eastern Conference Finals with the big boy on the bench..

The only Bobcats player who might crack the starting lineup in Milwaukee is Ball...nobody else would ever make it off the bench.

Ball, Hayward, and Rozier. You can pretty much can replace anyone but Giannis and Middleton (maybe Jrue). They closed out an ATL team with an injured Trae Young… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Ball, Hayward, and Rozier.

Possibly Ball...no chance on the other 2. 

14 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

You can pretty much can replace anyone but Giannis and Middleton (maybe Jrue).

Not with anyone playing for the Bobcats.

14 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

They closed out an ATL team with an injured Trae Young… 

He played over 35 minutes...no excuses.

Focus here Jimmy --- winning starts within the Office of the Owner...

  ...there is zero chance Mike Jordan will ever be able to manage the business to consistently compete with Wes Edens and Marc Lasry over time --- Mike simply is not qualified.

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Possibly Ball...no chance on the other 2. 

Not with anyone playing for the Bobcats.

He played over 35 minutes...no excuses.

Focus here Jimmy --- winning starts within the Office of the Owner...

  ...there is zero chance Mike Jordan will ever be able to manage the business to consistently compete with Wes Edens and Marc Lasry over time --- Mike simply is not qualified.

 

There is a reason Trae was 4-17 and 0-6 from 3 that game. He also missed the previous 2 games because of that injury.
The best lineup is Ball, Rozier, Hayward, Middleton, and Giannis. I would think any rational Bucks fan would take that in a heartbeat.

 

The NBA doesn’t really work that way. Do you think the Lakers won last year because of the team’s owner? It’s a player’s league and they jump around to form super teams. Lebron went down to Miami won a couple, back to Cleveland won another, and then to LA and won another. The Bucks are the exception to the rule because they have one insanely good player and played a injured Nets team then got matched up against a Suns team that go there beating a Lakers team without AD, Nuggets team without Murray, and Clippers team without Leonard. Jordan is far from a good owner, but it’s going to be tough to build a team in small market Charlotte. Look at how the Spurs have struggled since their stars retired… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Complete BS.

They closed out ATL in the Eastern Conference Finals with the big boy on the bench..

The only Bobcats player who might crack the starting lineup in Milwaukee is Ball...nobody else would ever make it off the bench.

Yeah man because Atlanta owned us this year. Man you're a donkey,  we were in 4th and better than Atlanta until people started getting hurt. Milwaukee is not run well and people were talking about firing their coach in the nets series.  Giannis is that entire team.  Swap him for pj Washington and the Hornets are in the finals too 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Complete BS.

They closed out ATL in the Eastern Conference Finals with the big boy on the bench..

The only Bobcats player who might crack the starting lineup in Milwaukee is Ball...nobody else would ever make it off the bench.

Its Hornets not Bobcats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

The NBA doesn’t really work that way.

Apparently it does...the Milwaukee Bucks are World Champions.

 

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Do you think the Lakers won last year because of the team’s owner?

Actually I think they won in spite of current ownership.

What I know for a fact is under the leadership of Dr. Jerry Buss the team made the playoffs 32-of-34 years...

...upon his death ownership was ceded to his inept children and they immediately missed the playoffs 6 straight seasons. 

NOTE:  The current Bobcats GM was the Lakers GM in that time period.

image.thumb.png.8b0def6ea2d4b7db2f26784080e915d1.png

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Apparently it does...the Milwaukee Bucks are World Champions.

 

Actually I think they won in spite of current ownership.

What I know for a fact is under the leadership of Dr. Jerry Buss the team made the playoffs 32-of-34 years...

...upon his death ownership was ceded to his inept children and they immediately missed the playoffs 6 straight seasons. 

NOTE:  The current Bobcats GM was the Lakers GM in that time period.

image.thumb.png.8b0def6ea2d4b7db2f26784080e915d1.png

They (LA) won in spite of ownership. There you have it. It starts with the owners right? Also how did Cleveland win with Lebron? Was it the owner? How have they been since he left? It’s the same owner. The players control this league like it or not. Had Giannis chosen to leave Milwaukee they would never had won. The man is a beast and had 50 of their 105 points that last game. I was glad to see him do it the hard way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

The Bucks are the exception to the rule...

Actually they are the embodiment of "The Rule".

The Rule:  Teams with lousy ownership never thrive.

Golden State Warriors:  Laughingstock of NBA, make playoffs 5 times in 33 years > NEW OWNER in 2010 > 5-Finals and 3 World Championships since.

LA Lakers:  Under leadership of Dr. Jerry Buss made the playoffs 32-of-34 years > NEW OWNER in 2013 > miss playoffs 6 straight seasons.

NY Knicks:  Make the playoffs 14 straight seasons > NEW OWNER in 1999 > miss playoffs 13 of 16 seasons. [Note: Dolan and Jordan are in class of their own, completely inept.]

Milwaukee Bucks:  Six 1st-round playoff exits in 15 seasons > NEW OWNERS in 2014 > 5-straight playoffs appearances, 7-4 playoffs series winning record, 2021 World Champions.

I could go on but think the point has been made...

...but just in case you missed it...

...the Charlotte Bobcats will never have meaningful success until there is a change in ownership.

The good news is a couple of smart guys from New York are now "partners" with MJ and I have a hunch that at some point they will (a)  either convince him to go away and let them manage the shared asset, or (b) straightway wrest control from him. 

Will be interesting to watch...😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It starts with the owners right?

In a place like Charlotte, yes 110%.

Ditto Milwaukee, etc...

The "super team" strategy is legit (to the detriment of the NBA) but it's by no means the only path to a championship.

In markets like ours (or Milwaukee) there is no path to a championship in the absence of superior ownership -- and Jordan ain't that...in fact, he's the opposite. 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SizzleBuzz said:

In a place like Charlotte, yes 110%.

Ditto Milwaukee, etc...

The "super team" strategy is legit (to the detriment of the NBA) but it's by no means the only path to a championship.

In markets like ours (or Milwaukee) there is no path to a championship in the absence of superior ownership -- and Jordan ain't that, in fact he's the opposite. 

So the backpedaling is starting! Got it. We can even look at Toronto constantly getting knocked out of the playoffs early, Leonard joins them and wins a championship. Leonard leaves and Toronto is back at being bounced early. The players control the league. Durant left the Warriors and they miss the playoffs, he joined the Nets and they are an instant contender. You referenced the 90s and early 2000s teams to counter this, but that was before the players took over. Lebron changed the whole NBA in that sense. As for the Bucks, they are Giannis’s team. They rise and fall with him. If he chooses to leave they will look like the Cavs when Lebron left. I know you hate player control, but that’s the NBA now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...