Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What to make of Gross-Matos


Tommy Jone
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah but what do you mean "become a legit NFL end?" That seems pretty subjective. By that definition, why wouldn't being a full time starter in year two be a "legit NFL end?"

I am not preaching anti-patience. I was just confused why you used Hardy as an example as not being...."legit" until year three. The biggest thing that changed in year 3 was double digit sacks production.

I agree, most rookies aren't going to be impact players initially. Sometimes starting as a rookie may even say more about your team than the player. Look at Troy Pride Jr. He probably had no business getting the PT he did but our secondary was pretty thin. So, even then there is a little nuance to each situation. I don't think there are hard rules about which position will mature at what rate.

I truly dont have a legit end list of checks. I said before in one of the quotes- starts dont matter for DL(personally). One on the list for "legit" is not wanting to remove them form the field. Just took hardy three years before his impact was felt by everyone; coaches, opponents, fans etc. Three years is normal amount for a player to become a pro. RB, LB, WR(new to the list), and ST can make a impact year one form all rounds-UDFAs. QB like WRs have changed to where they also could be with RB and LB. 

Another layer is even free agents that are vets, most take one year as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I truly dont have a legit end list of checks. I said before in one of the quotes- starts dont matter for DL(personally). One on the list for "legit" is not wanting to remove them form the field. Just took hardy three years before his impact was felt by everyone; coaches, opponents, fans etc. Three years is normal amount for a player to become a pro. RB, LB, WR(new to the list), and ST can make a impact year one form all rounds-UDFAs. QB like WRs have changed to where they also could be with RB and LB. 

Another layer is even free agents that are vets, most take one year as well. 

Yeah, it just kind of seems like your criteria is rather subjective. Not sure I would generally agree but it's hard to refute your opinion when there isn't much to actually refute. 

Agree to disagree on some of it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went back and watched all of Yetur's snaps from his first (vs LV), sixth (vs TB), and final (vs NO) games of his rookie season to try and see how he had progressed.

He... did not look good.

Cons

  • Was regularly one of the last DL to come out of his stance. Almost no burst. This was consistent in all three games that I went back and watched. Bravvion Roy was firing off of the ball faster than YGM on a regular basis.
  • Regularly lost contain or would over pursue upfield rather than setting the edge. He was single handedly responsible for 34yds against the Raiders when he failed to set the edge. The 98yd TD run vs. TB? Yetur failed to slide into the B gap and instead try to beat the OT to the outside (which was a common theme) and as a result a massive hole for Jones to run thru appeared. Rather stacking and shedding the blocker, YGM would just try to pick a side (again, usually the outside), and go that way where he'd easily be washed out of the play.
  • Was knocked to the ground frequently.
  • Inactive hands. Was regularly allowing OL to get into his chest and redirect at will.

Pros

  • Never stopped hustling. Even when knocked to the ground, he was fighting his way back to his feet.
  • Only 23, so he has time to grow and develop as a player. Most DEs take 3 - 5yrs (peaking at ~25yrs old) to develop unless they're something special. 

Going back and looking at his scouting profile, a lot of this seems to check out with the pre-draft analysis of YGM:

Quote

Strengths

  • Prototypical combination of size, athleticism and agility
  • Loose hips with short-area athleticism of a linebacker
  • Breaks down and plays under control in the backfield
  • Posted 35 tackles for loss and 17.5 sacks as two-year starter
  • Rangy chaser down the line of scrimmage
  • Quick cross-face stunts to disrupt the gaps
  • Easily crow-hops over cut block attempts
  • Adequate upfield rush burst
  • Has some hip flip to trim the edge
  • Shows bull rush then and hits switch to inside counter
  • Active to reignite secondary rush
  • Twists are fluid and fast
  • Good job of working back under tackles at top of the rush

Weaknesses

  • Hands need to be quicker and more violent as a pro
  • Mistimes punch, allowing blockers into frame
  • Average controlling point of attack against power
  • Can do a better job with play-side contain duties
  • Takes time to disengage when reached
  • Pad level raises, slowing burst to the top of the rush
  • Would like to see more urgent speed-to-power charges
  • Rush isn't built upon explosive movements or power
  • Could use a little more finesse to access the edges

 

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, it just kind of seems like your criteria is rather subjective. Not sure I would generally agree but it's hard to refute your opinion when there isn't much to actually refute. 

Agree to disagree on some of it.

Yes I dont have a check list and not going to "makeup" one(Id need to think long and hard, take months). Case by Case, but 3 years gos along with many spots. Starts as you now can give confusion. Everyone here hated (except me when he was a RT)Byron Bell and he got starts. Fua and McClain started their rookies years, but were AWFUL, but they where the best option at the time....thanks herniay. I think that group gave up 5.2 per carry that season, nearly as bad as the 2019 rushing stats. I mean Hardy/CJohnson were totally different players form their 3rd year to the 2nd. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Icege said:

Went back and watched all of Yetur's snaps from his first (vs LV), sixth (vs TB), and final (vs NO) games of his rookie season to try and see how he had progressed.

He... did not look good.

Cons

  • Was regularly one of the last DL to come out of his stance. Almost no burst. This was consistent in all three games that I went back and watched. Bravvion Roy was firing off of the ball faster than YGM on a regular basis.
  • Regularly lost contain or would over pursue upfield rather than setting the edge. He was single handedly responsible for 34yds against the Raiders when he failed to set the edge. The 98yd TD run vs. TB? Yetur failed to slide into the B gap and instead try to beat the OT to the outside (which was a common theme) and as a result a massive hole for Jones to run thru appeared. Rather stacking and shedding the blocker, YGM would just try to pick a side (again, usually the outside), and go that way where he'd easily be washed out of the play.
  • Was knocked to the ground frequently.
  • Inactive hands. Was regularly allowing OL to get into his chest and redirect at will.

Pros

  • Never stopped hustling. Even when knocked to the ground, he was fighting his way back to his feet.
  • Only 23, so he has time to grow and develop as a player. Most DEs take 3 - 5yrs (peaking at ~25yrs old) to develop unless they're something special. 

Going back and looking at his scouting profile, a lot of this seems to check out with the pre-draft analysis of YGM:

 

Not giving him a excuse, but he had a injury and came back early. I already forgot what it was, but think it was a 6 week deal and he cut it short. He could still lift some and added 5 lbs during the rehab. I think it ach tendon or planter fifahfuihufinbfiunainfa. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The killer High ankle was his injury. I will say this too- like most young bucks hes immature....more than others..... according to DL coach.

 https://www.panthers.com/news/panthers-designate-yetur-gross-matos-to-return-from-reserve-injured-list

 

Quote

The Panthers on Thursday designated defensive end Yetur Gross-Matos to return from the reserve/injured list.

Gross-Matos has missed Carolina's last three games after suffering a high ankle sprain against the Falcons in Week 5. He now has a 21-day window to practice before the Panthers must activate him to the 53-man roster or place him on season-ending IR. Gross-Matos may be placed on the active roster at any point during those 21 days.

Came back too soon as well, but the season was stinker....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Not giving him a excuse, but he had a injury and came back early. I already forgot what it was, but think it was a 6 week deal and he cut it short. He could still lift some and added 5 lbs during the rehab. I think it ach tendon or planter fifahfuihufinbfiunainfa. 

The ankle injury had a minimum impact when we look at his snap counts and how they grew towards the end of the year once Weatherly was shut down.

Week   Opp Num Pct
1   LVR 16 25%
2 @ TAM Inac Inac
3 @ LAC 24 31%
4   ARI 21 37%
5 @ ATL 17 26%
6   CHI Inju Inju
7 @ NOR Inju Inju
8   ATL Inju Inju
9 @ KAN 13 21%
10   TAM 46 58%
11   DET 27 48%
12 @ MIN 41 56%
14   DEN 42 69%
15 @ GNB 52 84%
16 @ WAS 37 52%
17   NOR 41 64%

In addition to that, he consistently showed the issues I mentioned throughout the season that don't have anything to do with the ankle (choosing to almost always go on the outside, failure to stack and shed, stagnant hands, consistently the last DL to come out of his stance, etc)

Edited by Icege
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Icege said:

The ankle injury had a minimum impact when we look at his snap counts and how they grew towards the end of the year once Weatherly was shut down.

Week   Opp Num Pct
1   LVR 16 25%
2 @ TAM Inac Inac
3 @ LAC 24 31%
4   ARI 21 37%
5 @ ATL 17 26%
6   CHI Inju Inju
7 @ NOR Inju Inju
8   ATL Inju Inju
9 @ KAN 13 21%
10   TAM 46 58%
11   DET 27 48%
12 @ MIN 41 56%
14   DEN 42 69%
15 @ GNB 52 84%
16 @ WAS 37 52%
17   NOR 41 64%

In addition to that, he consistently showed the issues I mentioned throughout the season that don't have anything to do with the ankle (choosing to almost always go on the outside, failure to stack and shed, stagnant hands, consistently the last DL to come out of his stance, etc)

You have the fresh look, I remember a rookie that showed flash in spots. ive traded in my cable box, so no chance to to re-watch all the games, nor do I want too.... I'll take your viewpoint with belief. I still hold he will be a better rucker tho....but I still was in Greg Little's corner til mid-season last year as well... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Basbear said:

You have the fresh look, I remember a rookie that showed flash in spots. ive traded in my cable box, so no chance to to re-watch all the games, nor do I want too.... I'll take your viewpoint with belief. I still hold he will be a better rucker tho....but I still was in Greg Little's corner til mid-season last year as well... 

Oh he definitely flashed, esp in the TB game.

Vs TB made an inside move on the LT that forced Brady to spin out and overthrow Gronk for what would've been a TD. He also knifed thru the line with the ball on the 1 to stop the RB for a loss. He also had another TFL earlier in the game where he was able to get around the OT from the outside and stuff the RB.

His motor seems to always be going, so he's got the tools. Just needs the technique and tactics.

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...