ESPN Power(less) Rankings for week 11

[Dpantherman]

http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings?year=2009&week=11

-only up one spot (20) after beating last week's #9 team

Here's how they voted:

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/9228/power-rankings-how-the-voters-voted-28

p.s.- john clayton is an idiot

[E CaT PanTHer]

at least one of them has us at #13. Probably a little generous at this point but if we beat Miami this week I think we're right there.

[mr beauxjangles]

Peter King - who never gives the Panthers even one sentence of coverage and once responded to an email from me with "Nobody else cares." - actually put the Panthers at #12 in his Fine Fifteen.

[Raskle]

Really? That fat fugstick actually said nobody else cares?? Makes me hate him even worse now.. thanks!!

[mr beauxjangles]

He's a total ass. I asked him how he could continue to ignore the second best team in the NFC week after week and he said something about there not being any compelling storylines. Really? You mean a running back tandem that combined for 2,300+ and 28 TDs isn't compelling? Undefeated at home? The absurdly tight NFC South race? Hell, even after the Giants/Panthers game last week, he wrote about Chad Pennington instead of the game between the top two NFC teams.

[Swarly]

these rankings are always a joke. Saints at #1? LOL. I guess Colts beating the Pats, and Saints BARELY beating the Rams warrants them a better ranking.. They deserve to be #2, don't get me wrong, but they are playing sloppy ass football these past few weeks, don't they have like 12 turnovers in 3 games?

Broncos shouldn't be in the top 10, Eagles should be a lot lower(near the 20'ish mark, and Carolina and Miami should have moved up a few spots at least.

[Brooklyn Bully]

He's a total ass. I asked him how he could continue to ignore the second best team in the NFC week after week and he said something about there not being any compelling storylines. Really? You mean a running back tandem that combined for 2,300+ and 28 TDs isn't compelling? Undefeated at home? The absurdly tight NFC South race? Hell, even after the Giants/Panthers game last week, he wrote about Chad Pennington instead of the game between the top two NFC teams.

While that may be true to each and every one of US...I challenge you to goto NFC East, South, West forums and all AFC forums and ask them if they give half a damn about the Panthers. You'll get an almost majority reply of "no". Charlotte is not a major city and it's in the South. He's correct, no one cares. The sooner you accept it, the sooner lack of coverage will insult you.

[unicar15]

Jake Delhomme = Inconsistency

Inconsistency = Skepticism

Therefore,

Jake Delhomme = Skepticism.

[CharlotteBeer.com]

these rankings are always a joke. Saints at #1? LOL. I guess Colts beating the Pats, and Saints BARELY beating the Rams warrants them a better ranking.. They deserve to be #2, don't get me wrong, but they are playing sloppy ass football these past few weeks, don't they have like 12 turnovers in 3 games?

Broncos shouldn't be in the top 10, Eagles should be a lot lower(near the 20'ish mark, and Carolina and Miami should have moved up a few spots at least.

I don't even have a problem with Saints at No. 1. Yes, they are making a ton of mistakes, but they are winning in spite of them. Not many teams would be able to do that (as evidence by last year's No. 1 offense, 8-8 Saints squad).

I might give the edge to the Colts, but the Saints, I think, might be the more complete team.

[Lt Pinkerton]

If the Saints and the Colts were to play right now, the Colts would beat them, no question. That's how these rankings should be calculated.

[panthers55]

when these rankings resulting in seedings for the playoffs I will care. until then it doesn't matter. Besides since I haven't heard it mentioned in weeks, this means we are still "Under the Radar".

WOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!