Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers Inactives


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, MasterAwesome said:

Yeah that’s correct, 8 active. Some people don’t know our roster very well apparently.

They are too busy complaining to actually take the time to count.

So 8 is pretty standard for NFL teams.

of the three backups you have:

Tecklenburg for backup center, which Brown can not do.

BC for backup OT, which Brown can not do.

So basically the staff is taking Daley over Brown, a 6th rounder in his second game?

...... this is our biggest coaching problem???

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

 

 

We aren't carrying 4 TE's for the offense, its special teams probably.  I'm pretty sure all 4 got ST snaps last week.

A lot of teams carry more TEs than just the ones you think about being part of the offense.

 

 

Daryll Johnson was our STs ace we picked up from the Bills, no?

Edited by OldhamA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Yeah lets activate 4 TEs that we won't use, and have our only 2 backup lineman a 3rd round rookie and a former 6th rounder with injury issues. All while our starters consist of 2 injury prone journeymen, a center who is just not good, and a guy who just came off the covid list. Good idea.

If you have 3 injuries to the same position group during a game you're fuged either way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...