Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 1 Post Script: Zach Wilson injured


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, run-run-pass-punt said:

But we should have traded everything for him... /s

I always wanted Minshew/Trubisky, but I think Darnold is going to end up being the better option if this small sample size is indicative of things to come.

And I think he's better than anyone we could have drafted (at our spot) as well. I never wanted Jones or Fields.

Fields I would've absolutely taken but agreed on Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, run-run-pass-punt said:

I guess we'll find out. I love his athletic ability, but I wasn't sold on him overall. Either way, it looks like we got a good one in Horn, and Darnold is playing well, so I'll count my blessings.

My one reservation was the long history of OSU QB failures in the NFL but that was my reservation with Brian Burns being an FSU edge rusher too.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My one reservation was the long history of OSU QB failures in the NFL but that was my reservation with Brian Burns being an FSU edge rusher too.

hahaha - I do remember all the "Everett Brown" talk when we drafted Burns - not saying you particular, I just remember all the grumbling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...