Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breaking from Sheena Quick: We passed on Justin Fields and began the trade for Darnold post Ohio St pro day


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, tiger7_88 said:

OK, good luck in your lottery then.

I've live in the Atlanta are since 1999 and have observed first hand how that lottery turns into results.

You want a Jerry Jones/Al Davis type. Ironically enough, the Cowboys are starting to find success again now that Jerry Jones has finally stopped back somewhat and let his football people drive the football decisions.

I don't doubt that Tepper will soon strongly urge Fitts and Rhule to make a bold move at QB if Darnold does indeed ultimately fail, but I do think he'll leave the final decision up to them on who they target. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You want a Jerry Jones/Al Davis type. Ironically enough, the Cowboys are starting to find success again now that Jerry Jones has finally stopped back somewhat and let his football people drive the football decisions.

I don't doubt that Tepper will soon strongly urge Fitts and Rhule to make a bold move at QB if Darnold does indeed ultimately fail, but I do think he'll leave the final decision up to them on who they target. 

No, what I'm saying is that you seem to be demanding an Arthur Blank type.

And honestly?  You want me to choose between Jerry/Al and Arthur? OK.

Then give me fugging Jerry/Al, cuz at least they've won the big one in their past instead of the "pretend feelings OMG WOKISM!" of the Arthur Blank leadership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

The billionaire ownership of the franchise doesn't seem to consider the quality of the starting QB position as being very important so far.

I mean, that's been made very clear for those paying attention and not hating over the last couple of years.

I don’t know. Theses last two QBs seem to be 100 percent Rhule. Tepper seems to really want a franchise QB but he keeps defaulting to Rhules decisions. 
Rhule seems to not see much value in a franchise QB and maybe that is because he is a college coach. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tiger7_88 said:

No, what I'm saying is that you seem to be demanding an Arthur Blank type.

And honestly?  You want me to choose between Jerry/Al and Arthur? OK.

Then give me fugging Jerry/Al, cuz at least they've won the big one in their past instead of the "pretend feelings OMG WOKISM!" of the Arthur Blank leadership.

No, I want a good manager. Good managers hire good people and then get out of their way offering input when needed but refusing to micromanage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You want a Jerry Jones/Al Davis type. Ironically enough, the Cowboys are starting to find success again now that Jerry Jones has finally stopped back somewhat and let his football people drive the football decisions.

I don't doubt that Tepper will soon strongly urge Fitts and Rhule to make a bold move at QB if Darnold does indeed ultimately fail, but I do think he'll leave the final decision up to them on who they target. 

Which makes me very worried because if Darnold ultimately doesn’t work out what does that say about a coaching staff that has failed twice. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No, I want a good manager. Good managers hire good people and then get out of their way offering input when needed but refusing to micromanage.

And this is my point.

You're getting Arthur-Blank-ism WITH EVEN LESS EXPERIENCE IN THE NFL THAN ARTHUR BLANK.

So, yeah, as I keep repeating, good luck with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What exactly is your point? Because honestly it kinda just seems like incoherent yelling about Arthur Blank.

OK, brother.

Sorry to confuse you with actual arguments;

S'ok, please enjoy the performance of your actual NFL team.  My apologies in requesting that you actually think. 

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tiger7_88 said:

OK, brother.

Sorry to confuse you with actual arguments;

S'ok, please enjoy the performance of your actual NFL team.  My apologies in requesting that you actually think. 

I'm just asking for clarification on your stance because it's not at all clear. You're just telling about Arthur Blank and seemingly wanting Tepper to morph into Al Davis. What am I missing here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...