Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This team not going to rally around Sam Darnold.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sam Darnold is getting worse by the snap and if he continues the rest of the season as the starter, the Panthers will not win another game.

The offense has completely given up on him. Darnold is throwing “Hospital Balls” as Steve Smith put it. Receivers are dropping balls because they’re worried he’s going to get the killed by throwing them into defenders. He feels pressure that isn’t there and is just completely ruined.

I blame the GM and coaching staff for not drafting Justin Fields or Mac Jones, or at least signing a veteran backup. Darnold was a risk no matter how you put it and they didn’t bring in a competent backup plan in case Darnold failed and now the season is ruined. 

Yet another MISERABLE Panthers season under David Tepper. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, uncfan888 said:

Someone on Twitter said darnold will be the starter all year next year.. If that happens, just skip the season

Well if stuff people are saying on twitter is always true I might need to pull over to the side of the road of life and reconsider my existence on this planet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, t96 said:

LOL Fields/Jones would not be the answer for us. Would've been a wasted top 10 pick. We overhauled the D the last couple years and still need to overhaul much of the O. It'll take a bit more time.

You sure about that. Darnold is a bust. Panthers went all in on this loser. Another guy might have gotten the team to rally around him. Darnold is a bonafide chump no one believes in. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...