Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade CMC


ncsu12engr
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ColumbusCounty said:

Man hell no... we've got worse every game since he's been gone. 

The whole offense changes when he's in. It's a reason we gets the majority of the touches. THIS is why.

Last year we didn’t get worse on offense with him out.  The OL was better though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FugginPoo said:

Last year we didn’t get worse on offense with him out.  The OL was better though

Curtis Samuel was the reason for that. When Samuel went down for a couple games..same result. 

OL was better though..still dont even know how that's literally possible. 

Bring back Okung and get Christian in the game. 

What will happen = We will continue to struggle until we are out of playoff contention and then he'll come back and we'll start winning. Just enough to push us out of draft range for an impact player. Watch what I say. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Not true at all. For a team trading for him, it’s $9M total for the rest of 2021 and 2022. Then it’s about $12M a year after that. It’s a very easy contract for the next guy and really cheap through 2022.

If a team needs a RB and is a contender, I’d trade for him in a heartbeat. No idea what we’d ask for, but his contract is not a problem for the next team. 


That’s a ton of money for a RB that rarely hits the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

His contract for the next team would be $9M a year. Yes, health is a concern, but if I’m Arizona or the Rams, I’d take a chance on him immediately. Let him get healthy for the playoffs. He costs next to nothing this year and $9M next year. You said his contract wasn’t attractive and that’s 100% wrong for a team that would get him. He’s got no guarantees after 2022. It’s a fantastic contract for a team getting potentially one of the top couple non-QB players in the game.

The Bills should call us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Lol we do that and we’ll lose at least 25 games in a row 

You would rather win the 5 to 10 games he stays healthy during that 25 game stretch and get nothing of value from him when we realize in 2 more seasons that he just can't stay healthy? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...