Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold Contract


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

I've seen some confusion about this in various threads here. With the new 5th year option rules making that 5th year 100% guaranteed (used to be guaranteed for injury only), many think we're stuck with that no matter what (i.e. we trade for Watson, we have to carry both of them and the big cap hits). This is NOT true.

 

We can't save a dime by releasing Darnold, but if we trade him after this season we are on the hook for absolutely nothing. No dead cap at all. Yes with that cap hit and the way he's playing, he's a liability, so we may have to attach a mid round pick to him to get a bad team flush with cap space to take him on, but we can absolutely get out of the deal after this year by trading him. Worth clarifying, and note I'm not trying to defend the trade or picking up the 5th option -- in hindsight both were clearly just flat out bad moves. But that 5th year option just isn't quite as crippling as many think.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is finding a buyer at any price. Who wants to take the risk we just took and failed with?

The most interesting part of the Darnold contact is we did for Darnold what we were unwilling to do for Cam.

I was not an advocate of resigning Cam to a long term contract for the same reasons we shouldn't have extended Darnold on a 5th year option. This year should have been a "prove it" deal, just like Cam's final year of his contract.

But the Panthers compromised on their values instead of sticking to their guns and they cost themselves another big bit of dead money if they can't move Darnold on top of losing the draft picks.

  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

It wouldn't be a risk for the other team, they'd just be buying a draft pick from us. 

Thanks for the clarification. So basically, if we can find a trade partner, he would basically wind up costing a 2nd, 4th, 6th and an additional midround draft spot in addition to his current pay for this years' performance. It's better than 18M but still -

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jared Patterson said:

Would a team be wiling to give up a 7 for Darnold tho to take on that contract?

If we attached a 4th or 3rd for sure. Would be buying a mid round pick just for $18M in cap space 1 year. For a team not close to competing with plenty of cap space that is a massive win for them. We saw it with Brock Osweiler, it took a 2nd attached to him to get rid of his contract but his contract had guaranteed money for like 3-4 years, Darnold is just 1 year and cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cranky said:

Thanks for the clarification. So basically, if we can find a trade partner, he would basically wind up costing a 2nd, 4th, 6th and an additional midround draft spot in addition to his current pay for this years' performance. It's better than 18M but still -

Yes but everything already spent is just a sunk cost at this point. It was a bad deal, we already know that. IF we were to trade for Watson and take on his cap hit, then it'll be worth that additional pick to get rid of Darnold so we have cap space to keep guys like Donte, Reddick, DJ, Burns, Gilmore, etc.

 

It sucks but it's the situation we're in and we can only look at moves to make now, can't change what we already gave up and can't undo the 5th year option...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

I've seen some confusion about this in various threads here. With the new 5th year option rules making that 5th year 100% guaranteed (used to be guaranteed for injury only), many think we're stuck with that no matter what (i.e. we trade for Watson, we have to carry both of them and the big cap hits). This is NOT true.

 

We can't save a dime by releasing Darnold, but if we trade him after this season we are on the hook for absolutely nothing. No dead cap at all. Yes with that cap hit and the way he's playing, he's a liability, so we may have to attach a mid round pick to him to get a bad team flush with cap space to take him on, but we can absolutely get out of the deal after this year by trading him. Worth clarifying, and note I'm not trying to defend the trade or picking up the 5th option -- in hindsight both were clearly just flat out bad moves. But that 5th year option just isn't quite as crippling as many think.

It’s no different than Teddy’s 20M guaranteed last year. What draft pick is going to make a team want to pay a huge bust 18.5M to be a backup. They had to pay 17M of 20M just to make TB go away. Best case, is they only pay 15M of something that had no logical reason to ever happen. Especially when it just happened the year before and burned them. And that would take some improvements to give him the same value as Teddy had. Which is sad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joemac said:

Who the hell is going to trade for him, and then pay him 18 million dollars next season?!?!  Bill O'Brien isnt a GM anywhere anymore unfortunately...

I mean it's not out of the question, but the Panthers will most assuredly have to give up draft picks in the deal. A team that's not competing and has a low cap hit might be willing to take Darnold for a year if they get a 3rd rounder out of it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, t96 said:

If we attached a 4th or 3rd for sure. Would be buying a mid round pick just for $18M in cap space 1 year. For a team not close to competing with plenty of cap space that is a massive win for them. We saw it with Brock Osweiler, it took a 2nd attached to him to get rid of his contract but his contract had guaranteed money for like 3-4 years, Darnold is just 1 year and cheaper.

  Osweiler had a 16M guaranteed base salary for that year to whatever team traded for him. Much like Darnold. And that took a 2nd. What would this cost? A 2nd and a 3rd that they don’t even have anyhow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...