Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold will be Jimmy Clausen 2.0


PanthersGOATFan336
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Sam is more disappointing than Pickles, even if Clausen was worse under center. 

 

I’d cast my vote for Jimmy Jam. 

Sam is just doing what he has done for now 4 straight years 

I didn’t like Jimmy from the jump but his level of suck was more surprising just because we hadn’t witnessed it in the NFL yet IMO.  Jimmy didn’t even look like he had played a Notre Dame.  Looked like he pulled a Kobe or Lebron and just came out of HS.   So bad.  Man he was bad.    Mel Kiper still showing up to work after his mouth wrote that check too

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I’d cast my vote for Jimmy Jam. 

Sam is just doing what he has done for now 4 straight years 

I didn’t like Jimmy from the jump but his level of suck was more surprising just because we hadn’t witnessed it in the NFL yet IMO. 

Wait so sam isnt as bad because he has been doing it for 4 years? NYJ didnt like sam from jump either..look at his highlights i promise you its only 30 seconds long

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

Was he tho?

 

Darnold was a top 3 pick that, in conjunction with the Jets, hoodwinked us and others into thinking that he was somehow better than what he put on tape--so much so that we gave up not only a second but a fourth round draft pick for him. And, we gave him an extension because our HC AND our GM, the scouting gurus, had everyone thinking that Darnold had some untapped potential to be a franchise QB.

Clausen was just another failed rookie QB who was in over his head. And he wasn't even a first rounder. He had way less expectations than Darnold.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...