Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This “analytics” conditioning is garbage


The Question
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Most of our major injuries this year came from non contact plays. The only thing prevented from making football "soft" as you say is concussions. 

So great comparison!

Injuries accumulate over time with repeated stress, like contact plays. Despite a player going out on one specific play, the injury often has been building up to the point where it will cause failure.

So thanks for again illustrating that you have no idea what you're talking about!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panther'sBigD said:

Injuries accumulate over time with repeated stress, like contact plays. Despite a player going out on one specific play, the injury often has been building up to the point where it will cause failure.

So thanks for again illustrating that you have no idea what you're talking about!

This is a very good take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Squid Game said:

Go check out how well the Charlotte Hornets have done in the drafts since they got rid of that stupid “analytic genius” Rich Cho at GM for one who has the eye talent for good players. 
 

Rich Cho’s picks: Kemba, MKG**, Zeller**, Vonleh**, Kaminsky**, Monk**   (**bust)

 

Mitch Kupchak: Bridges, PJ, LaMelo, Bouknight/Kai (too early) 


 

David Tepper is such a stupid sport owner. When he finally realize that this is football and not the stock market where math/analytic doesn’t play a big part in, we’ll start winning. 
 

Analytics should only be .05% of the equation.

Stupid math nerds that have no idea what they are looking at trying to make themselves relevant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading this post I wasn't sure if it was about injuries since that was talked about the most. Analytics is a part of football beginning around middle school and in every sport! Analytics=Statistics that's all Analytics is it is based off what has already happened to predict what could happen. Analytics has nothing to do with injures or how hard a team practices for upcoming games. Tepper has no control over how preparation is done and the only connection to a stock market is Analytics which is a prediction from past happenings on how to prepare/predict future happenings!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2021 at 6:21 PM, mc52beast said:

Is it analytics that tells our staff to throw the freaking ball a trillion times when our o-line is Swiss cheese and our qb is seeing ghosts…

Actually it is because the previous teams that played their opponents that week has showed that the team their playing is weak on defending the passing game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...