Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam in our system in this team right now


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Snake said:

Logic hasn't always been the best here. Notice how I'm always the insert QB hugger guy now too. The fact that Heinicke is playing better than Darnald should raise some eyebrows around here but it doesn't. 🤷‍♂️

aren't they both on 3 game losing streaks and committing a bunch of turnovers? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sam sucks. I'm not crying about it. This is exactly what I expected. You're sitting here honest to god trying to argue that Sam Darnold would be better than Dak Prescott all other things remaining equal. Get it together, man. That's 🤡 show poo.

 

Way to twist his words around. Maybe reread what he actually said.

 

I'll help. @Snake said the if you put Sam in Dallas, and Dak here. Sam probably plays better. Pretty simple concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Way to twist his words around. Maybe reread what he actually said.

 

I'll help. @Snake said the if you put Sam in Dallas, and Dak here. Sam probably plays better. Pretty simple concept.

put Sam in Dallas and he still cant' read a field though.  So it largely would just be the Dallas machine doing what it does.  They become super run heavy.  Sam just checking down. 

Meanwhile, Dak would be down here doing what Dak does.   Dak can read the field.  Dak can get the ball out quick.  We saw last year that can work.  But unlike Teddy, Dak would then bring everything Teddy lacked.  He would be making all those plays downfield.  

What team would have a better record? Don't know.  Which QB would be better? Dak.  And it's not hard.  Dak can play QB in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iamhubby1 said:

 

So...once again you  take no responsibility  for misquoting, then insulting another Huddler.

 

Got it.

I said all things being equal. You know, like swapping roles. I don't need to insult anyone trying to argue that Darnold is better than Prescott. Hell, I can't possibly insult their football intelligence any worse than they already are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

put Sam in Dallas and he still cant' read a field though.  So it largely would just be the Dallas machine doing what it does.  They become super run heavy.  Sam just checking down. 

Meanwhile, Dak would be down here doing what Dak does.   Dak can read the field.  Dak can get the ball out quick.  We saw last year that can work.  But unlike Teddy, Dak would then bring everything Teddy lacked.  He would be making all those plays downfield.  

What team would have a better record? Don't know.  Which QB would be better? Dak.  And it's not hard.  Dak can play QB in the NFL. 

 

You are just speculating. Reading the field? Throwing downfield? Sam can do those as well. 

 

Agree to disagree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iamhubby1 said:

You are just speculating. Reading the field? Throwing downfield? Sam can do those as well.

We have visual evidence of his inability to see the field in the horrific interceptions he has thrown with time and other options.  When was the last time he completed a deep pass? Week one?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

You are just speculating. Reading the field? Throwing downfield? Sam can do those as well. 

 

Agree to disagree. 

Well, one of the primary knock on Sam has always been his inablity to see the field.  There is lots and lots and lots of legit reporting on that from NFL coaches.

and did you watch this week with Chris Simms breaking it down for you.  Like literally walking you through how clueless Sam is when it comes to seeing the field and knowing where to go?  Explain that.   That can't be blamed on a OL.  That can't be blamed on playcalls.  The play says to go X because the defense does Y.  Sam doesn't look X.  It's QB 101. 

Sam isn't a QB from the neck up.  Just the neck down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

You are just speculating. Reading the field? Throwing downfield? Sam can do those as well. 

 

Agree to disagree. 

 

1 minute ago, frankw said:

We have visual evidence of his inability to see the field in the horrific interceptions he has thrown with time and other options.  When was the last time he completed a deep pass? Week one?

There have been several detailed breakdowns posted to the Huddle this week demonstrating Sam's issues reading the field. He's got the arm to throw it all over the yard, but he's not processing even basic QB 101 stuff to know where to fire that cannon of arm of his.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

We have visual evidence of his inability to see the field in the horrific interceptions he has thrown with time and other options.  When was the last time he completed a deep pass? Week one?

 

When's the last time he had time to throw?

 

The real problem is; At the start of the year most thought 5-8 wins would be an improvement. Then the 3 game win streak, followed by 4 loses. Now folks are up in arms. That is the problem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you think the NFL or NBA are worried about lawsuits or something like officiating scandals bringing down their empires, I think you're giving them way too much credit.  Go watch the documentary on Tim Donaghy in the NBA and who was involved and what he did.  One of the guys he worked with is still one of the league's top trusted officials, especially for playoff games.  IIRC, they have records showing he was the person Donaghy exchanged phone calls with the most during his time fixing games.  And his reputation is beyond horrible...  but he's untouchable.  I also encourage you to go watch DeMaurice Smith's Breakfast Club interview.  He laid out how for fans, we just know these organizations as a singular, public entity - like THE Carolina Panthers, or THE Dallas Cowboys- but, in actuality, he said that is the public-facing identity of an umbrella company comprised of countless smaller businesses and LLCs.  He is tasked with trying to audit their books, and he said these organizations are structured in such a way that even HE can't ever know what they truly make in a year.  It's impossible.  And now, this is just me speculating on top of that, but you think the league's themselves are structured similarly?  They are untouchable.  IIRC, they are recognized legally as "entertainment" organizations, thus protecting themselves in cases where integrity would come into question.  They are protected, layer, behind layer, behind layer.  Betting works because there is some degree of control that ensures the house wins more than it loses, by a lot.  The short of it is, "Give them bread and circuses" and all that jazz.  These leagues operate with total impunity.  Again, it's not just because I'm a Panthers fan, but even if I wasn't and I watched Superbowl 50 without a dog in the fight I would walk away feeling like that outcome was controlled and influenced HEAVILY to where the Panthers were not given a level playing field.  The same poo happens every Sunday to teams playing those blue blood franchises and ones with intriguing storylines. 
    • This Chuba isn't getting traded, but Rico very well could be in a few weeks if he keeps playing well in a tandem backfield with Chuba also playing well. I think we'd end up going with a two headed monster in that case, but with Rico being on a one year deal, it does open up the possibility of a contending team offering up a decent pick for him.  Depending on the recovery of Hampton, I could see someone like the Chargers giving us a 4th for him if they think he could put them over the top, he would fit nicely in a Harbaugh system I think. If it comes to that, we need to make that trade, as I can't see any way we re-sign Rico with all our other needs and getting Brooks back too.  And he's not going to get a contract big enough to get us any comp picks in return, especially if/when we sign a FA or two ourselves.  So if we're not going to bring him back, the prudent decision would really be to get a draft pick for him at the deadline.
    • It's all about what they do at QB. It's clear the rest of the roster is improving. If they commit long term to Young because he's being carried to wins then we're fuged. I think that's a separate issue to finally being competitive again.  There's no QB in this Draft that's going to ride in on his white horse on day one and save us, so we absolutely shouldn't be playing for Draft position. 
×
×
  • Create New...